Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD A4-6300 vs Intel Celeron N2805
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD A4-6300
100 %
2C / 2T · 3.90 GHz
Intel Celeron N2805
33 %
2C / 2T · 1.46 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD A4-6300
100 %
2C / 2T · 3.90 GHz
Intel Celeron N2805
40 %
2C / 2T · 1.46 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
AMD A4-6300
100 %
AMD Radeon HD 8370D
Intel Celeron N2805
22 %
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
More benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-6300 | Intel Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD A (112) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | AMD A4-6000 (3) | Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 (17) |
| Architecture | Richland (Piledriver) | Bay Trail |
| Technology | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Notebook |
| Socket | FM2 | BGA 1170 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-6300 | Intel Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 2x |
| Frequency: | 3.70 GHz | 1.46 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.90 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.90 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 1.00 MB | 1.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-6300 | Intel Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon HD 8370D | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) |
| GPU frequency | 0.76 GHz | 0.31 - 0.67 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 2 / 128 | 4 / 32 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 2 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Technology | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2013 | Q3/2013 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-6300 | Intel Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-6300 | Intel Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1866 (29.9 GB/s) | DDR3-1066 (8.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 4 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 4 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 2.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-6300 | Intel Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65 W | 4.3 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 2.5 W | |
| T. junction max. | 80 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-6300 | Intel Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q2/2013 | Q3/2013 |
| Release price | 45 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD A4-6300 is 3.5 stars (11 ratings), while Intel Celeron N2805 has received 3.2 stars (6 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
AMD A4-6300
2C / 2T · 3.90 GHz
9
Intel Celeron N2805
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
