Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD 3015e vs Intel Celeron N5105
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD 3015e
79 %
2C / 4T · 2.30 GHz
Intel Celeron N5105
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.90 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD 3015e
47 %
2C / 4T · 1.60 GHz
Intel Celeron N5105
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.60 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
AMD 3015e
64 %
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 (Raven Ridge)
Intel Celeron N5105
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Jasper Lake)
More benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD 3015e | Intel Celeron N5105 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD E (23) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | AMD 3000e/Ce (3) | Intel Celeron N4000/N5000 (6) |
| Architecture | Dali (Zen) | Jasper Lake |
| Technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | FT5 | BGA 1338 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD 3015e | Intel Celeron N5105 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 4x Tremont |
| Frequency: | 1.20 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.30 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 1.60 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| L2-Cache | 1.00 MB | 1.50 MB |
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | 4.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD 3015e | Intel Celeron N5105 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 (Raven Ridge) | Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Jasper Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 GHz | 0.45 - 0.90 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 3 / 192 | 24 / 192 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q1/2018 | Q1/2021 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD 3015e | Intel Celeron N5105 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD 3015e | Intel Celeron N5105 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-1600 (12.8 GB/s) | DDR4-2933 (46.9 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 12 | 3.0 x 8 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 11.8 GB/s | 7.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD 3015e | Intel Celeron N5105 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 6 W | 10 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 20 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD 3015e | Intel Celeron N5105 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q3/2020 | Q1/2021 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD 3015e is 1.6 stars (7 ratings), while Intel Celeron N5105 has received 3.8 stars (86 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Celeron N5105
4C / 4T · 2.90 GHz
9
AMD 3015e
2C / 4T · 2.30 GHz
Popular Comparisons
