UNISOC T770 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| UNISOC T770 | HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G | |
CPU comparisonUNISOC T770 or HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The UNISOC T770 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The UNISOC T770 was released in Q1/2020. The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.58 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G was released in Q2/2020. |
||
| UNISOC 5G (3) | Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| UNISOC 5G 6nm (2) | CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2) |
| 0 | Generation | 7 |
| -- | Architecture | Cortex-A76 / Cortex-A55 |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe UNISOC T770 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz. The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.58 GHz. |
||
| UNISOC T770 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.50 GHz 1x Cortex-A76 |
A-Core | 2.58 GHz 1x Cortex-A76 |
| 2.20 GHz 3x Cortex-A76 |
B-Core | 2.40 GHz 3x Cortex-A76 |
| 2.00 GHz 4x Cortex-A55 |
C-Core | 1.84 GHz 4x Cortex-A55 |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| ARM Mali-G57 MP4 | GPU | ARM Mali-G77 MP8 |
| 0.78 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.80 GHz |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Vallhall 1 | GPU Generation | Vallhall 1 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| 2 | Max. displays | 1 |
| 4 | Compute units | 8 |
| 64 | Shader | 128 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 4 GB | Max. GPU Memory | 4 GB |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-G57 MP4 | GPU | ARM Mali-G77 MP8 |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec AV1 | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe UNISOC T770 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G can connect up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. |
||
| UNISOC T770 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G |
| LPDDR4X-2133, | Memory | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The UNISOC T770 has a TDP of --, that of the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G is --. |
||
| UNISOC T770 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe UNISOC T770 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G cache has a total of 0.00 MB. |
||
| UNISOC T770 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G |
| 6 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Chiplet |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | -- |
| -- | Socket | -- |
| None | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Android | Operating systems | Android |
| Q1/2020 | Release date | Q2/2020 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.58 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
8C 8T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
8C 8T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
UNISOC T770
ARM Mali-G57 MP4 @ 0.78 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
ARM Mali-G77 MP8 @ 0.80 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
8C 8T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
8C 8T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| UNISOC T770 | HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
