Samsung Exynos 990 vs Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Samsung Exynos 990 | Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) | |
CPU comparisonSamsung Exynos 990 or Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Samsung Exynos 990 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.73 GHz. Up to 12 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 990 was released in Q1/2020. The Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) has 20 cores with 20 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to 128 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) was released in Q1/2022. |
||
| Samsung Exynos (47) | Family | Apple M series (25) |
| Samsung Exynos 990 (1) | CPU group | Apple M1 (9) |
| 4 | Generation | 1 |
| Exynos M5/Cortex-A76/-A55 | Architecture | M1 |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Samsung Exynos 990 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.73 GHz. The Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) has 20 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 0.60 GHz (3.20 GHz). |
||
| Samsung Exynos 990 | Characteristic | Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) |
| 8 | Cores | 20 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.73 GHz 2x Exynos M5 |
A-Core | 0.60 GHz (3.20 GHz) 16x Firestorm |
| 2.50 GHz 2x Cortex-A76 |
B-Core | 0.60 GHz (2.06 GHz) 4x Icestorm |
| 2.00 GHz 4x Cortex-A55 |
C-Core | -- |
NPU AI performanceThe performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 990 | Characteristic | Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) |
| Samsung AI engine | AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine |
| 2 NPU cores @ 15 TOPS | AI specifications | 32 Neural cores @ 22 TOPS |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| ARM Mali-G77 MP11 | GPU | Apple M1 Ultra (64 Core) |
| 0.80 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.39 GHz |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 1.30 GHz |
| Vallhall 1 | GPU Generation | 1 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| 1 | Max. displays | 5 |
| 11 | Compute units | 1024 |
| 176 | Shader | 8192 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 4 GB | Max. GPU Memory | 64 GB |
| 12 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-G77 MP11 | GPU | Apple M1 Ultra (64 Core) |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | Decode |
| Decode | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Samsung Exynos 990 supports a maximum of 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) can connect up to 128 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 990 | Characteristic | Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) |
| LPDDR5-2750 | Memory | LPDDR5-6400 |
| 12 GB | Max. Memory | 128 GB |
| 4 (Quad Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 819.2 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| 1.50 MB | L2 Cache | 52.00 MB |
| 2.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Samsung Exynos 990 has a TDP of --, that of the Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) is 60 W. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 990 | Characteristic | Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 60 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | 120 W |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Samsung Exynos 990 has a 3.50 MB cache, while the Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) cache has a total of 52.00 MB. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 990 | Characteristic | Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) |
| 7 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Chiplet |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8.5-A (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation |
| -- | Socket | -- |
| None | Virtualization | Apple Virtualization Framework |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | macOS |
| Q1/2020 | Release date | Q1/2022 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
20C 20T @ 0.60 GHz (3.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Samsung Exynos 990
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz |
||
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 990
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 990
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 990
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 990
ARM Mali-G77 MP11 @ 0.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Apple M1 Ultra (64 Core) @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 990
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Performance for Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is given here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher.
Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
|
|
Samsung Exynos 990
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 0.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 990
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 990
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 990
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 990
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 990
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 0.60 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 990
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Samsung Exynos 990 | Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
Apple Mac Studio (2022) |
News and articles for the Samsung Exynos 990 and the Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Apple M2 Pro with more CPU cores and production in 3 nm ?
Posted by Stefan on 2022-06-28
After Apple surprisingly presented the normal Apple M2 processor as the first successor to the Apple M1 already in June 2022, the Apple M2 Pro and the Apple M2 Max may follow in autumn. The difference in performance compared to the basic version could be even greater this time and range from 25 to 40 percent.
In this article we describe how Apple could realize this and why the price should also go up.
In this article we describe how Apple could realize this and why the price should also go up.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - Cinebench R23 Benchmark projection
Posted by Stefan on 2022-06-10
We give you a preview of AMD's new Zen 4 desktop processors and calculate the performance of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X top model for the new AM5 socket. The performance data and other technical details come directly from the press kit that AMD released as part of its Financial Analyst Day on June 9, 2022.
Up to 15 percent more single-core performance and 35 percent more multi-core performance of the 16-core model are realistic !
Up to 15 percent more single-core performance and 35 percent more multi-core performance of the 16-core model are realistic !
Apple M2 vs Apple M1 - What are the differences?
Posted by Stefan on 2022-06-09
During WWDC 2022 on June 6th, 2022 Apple surprisingly presented its new Apple M2 processor. This will initially be installed in a completely revised Apple MacBook Air with 13.6 inches, a even thinner form factor and new colors. Apple also updated the already known (old) Apple MacBook Pro 13.3 with touch bar.
Many leakers had counted on Apple not presenting its new second-generation M processor until the fall. But things turned out differently. And there is very likely a reason for that: the improvements in the Apple M2 are limited compared to the predecessor.
Many leakers had counted on Apple not presenting its new second-generation M processor until the fall. But things turned out differently. And there is very likely a reason for that: the improvements in the Apple M2 are limited compared to the predecessor.
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
