Samsung Exynos 9825 vs AMD A4-3400

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 9825 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD A4-3400
Samsung Exynos 9825 AMD A4-3400

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Samsung Exynos 9825 and the AMD A4-3400 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Samsung Exynos 9825 8 core processor released in Q3/2019 with the AMD A4-3400 which has 2 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2011.
Samsung Exynos (47) Family AMD A (112)
Samsung Exynos 9825 (1) CPU group AMD A4-3000 (3)
3 Generation 1
Exynos M4/Cortex-A75/-A55 Architecture Llano (K10)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 9825 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.73 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The AMD A4-3400 clocks with 2.70 GHz, has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic AMD A4-3400
8 Cores 2
8 Threads 2
hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? Yes
2.73 GHz
2x Exynos M4
A-Core 2.70 GHz
2.31 GHz
2x Cortex-A75
B-Core --
1.95 GHz
4x Cortex-A55
C-Core --

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic AMD A4-3400
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU AMD Radeon HD 6410D
0.70 GHz GPU frequency 0.60 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Bifrost 3 GPU Generation 3
7 nm Technology 32 nm
2 Max. displays 2
12 Compute units 2
192 Shader 160
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
4 GB Max. GPU Memory 1 GB
12 DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU AMD Radeon HD 6410D
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC Decode
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to 12 GB of memory in a maximum of 4 memory channels is supported by the Samsung Exynos 9825, while the AMD A4-3400 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s enabled.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic AMD A4-3400
LPDDR4X-1866 Memory DDR3-1600
12 GB Max. Memory
4 (Quad Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 25.6 GB/s
No ECC No
1.50 MB L2 Cache 1.00 MB
2.00 MB L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The Samsung Exynos 9825 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the AMD A4-3400 is 65 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic AMD A4-3400
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 65 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 9825 has 3.50 MB cache and is manufactured in 7 nm. The cache of AMD A4-3400 is at 1.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 32 nm.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic AMD A4-3400
7 nm Technology 32 nm
Unknown Chip design Unknown
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE3, SSE4a
-- Socket FM1
None Virtualization AMD-V
No AES-NI No
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q3/2019 Release date Q3/2011
-- Release price 28 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 9825 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.5 stars (2 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD A4-3400 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 9825 (100%)
AMD A4-3400 (48%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 9825 (100%)
AMD A4-3400 (30%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
731 (100%)
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
349 (48%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
2098 (100%)
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
643 (31%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
ARM Mali-G76 MP12 @ 0.70 GHz
607 (100%)
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
AMD Radeon HD 6410D @ 0.60 GHz
192 (32%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
3714 (100%)
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
1082 (29%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
806 (100%)
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
2069 (100%)
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
125 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
245 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
455970 (100%)
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
243 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
66 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz
125 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 9825 AMD A4-3400
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GSamsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
2. Samsung Exynos 9825Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Samsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GSamsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
5. Samsung Exynos 9825Samsung Exynos 990 Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Samsung Exynos 990
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GSamsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888Samsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
8. AMD Athlon 3000GAMD A4-3400 AMD Athlon 3000G vs AMD A4-3400
9. AMD A4-3400Intel Core i5-5200U AMD A4-3400 vs Intel Core i5-5200U
10. AMD A4-5000AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-5000 vs AMD A4-3400


back to index