Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Samsung Exynos 9820 | Intel Core Ultra 5 135H | |
CPU comparisonSamsung Exynos 9820 or Intel Core Ultra 5 135H - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Samsung Exynos 9820 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.70 GHz. Up to 12 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9820 was released in Q1/2019. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H has 14 cores with 18 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to 96 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H was released in Q4/2023. |
||
| Samsung Exynos (47) | Family | Intel Core Ultra 5 (10) |
| Samsung Exynos 9820 (1) | CPU group | Intel Core Ultra 100H (5) |
| 3 | Generation | 1 |
| Exynos M4/Cortex-A75/-A55 | Architecture | Meteor Lake H |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Samsung Exynos 9820 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.70 GHz. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H has 14 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.70 GHz (4.60 GHz). |
||
| Samsung Exynos 9820 | Characteristic | Intel Core Ultra 5 135H |
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 18 |
| hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.70 GHz 2x Exynos M4 |
A-Core | 1.70 GHz (4.60 GHz) 4x Redwood Cove |
| 2.30 GHz 2x Cortex-A75 |
B-Core | 1.20 GHz (3.60 GHz) 8x Crestmont |
| 1.90 GHz 4x Cortex-A55 |
C-Core | 0.70 GHz (2.50 GHz) 2x Crestmont |
Artificial Intelligence and Machine LearningProcessors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 9820 | Characteristic | Intel Core Ultra 5 135H |
| -- | AI hardware | Intel AI engine |
| -- | AI specifications | Intel AI Boost @ 1.4 GHz (OpenVINO, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT) |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 | GPU | Intel Iris Xe 8 Core Graphics 128 EUs (Meteor Lake) |
| 0.70 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.60 GHz |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 2.20 GHz |
| Bifrost 3 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 7 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| 2 | Max. displays | 4 |
| 12 | Compute units | 128 |
| 192 | Shader | 1024 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | Yes |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 4 GB | Max. GPU Memory | 32 GB |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 12.2 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 | GPU | Intel Iris Xe 8 Core Graphics 128 EUs (Meteor Lake) |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | Decode |
| No | Codec AV1 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Samsung Exynos 9820 supports a maximum of 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H can connect up to 96 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 9820 | Characteristic | Intel Core Ultra 5 135H |
| LPDDR4X-1866 | Memory | LPDDR5X-7500, DDR5-5600 |
| 12 GB | Max. Memory | 96 GB |
| 4 (Quad Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 120.0 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| 1.50 MB | L2 Cache | 14.00 MB |
| 2.00 MB | L3 Cache | 18.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 5.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 20 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 78.8 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Samsung Exynos 9820 has a TDP of --, that of the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is 28 W. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 9820 | Characteristic | Intel Core Ultra 5 135H |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 28 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | 115 W |
| -- | TDP up | 65 W |
| -- | TDP down | 20 W |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 110 °C |
Technical detailsThe Samsung Exynos 9820 has a 3.50 MB cache, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H cache has a total of 32.00 MB. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 9820 | Characteristic | Intel Core Ultra 5 135H |
| 8 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Chiplet |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| -- | Socket | BGA 2049 |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 11, Linux |
| Q1/2019 | Release date | Q4/2023 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 2.70 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
14C 18T @ 1.70 GHz (4.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Samsung Exynos 9820
8C 8T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9820
8C 8T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9820
8C 8T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9820
8C 8T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9820
ARM Mali-G76 MP12 @ 0.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
Intel Iris Xe 8 Core Graphics 128 EUs (Meteor Lake) @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9820
8C 8T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9820
8C 8T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9820
8C 8T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9820
8C 8T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9820
8C 8T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9820
8C 8T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
CPU performance per watt (efficiency)
Efficiency of the processor under full load in the Cinebench R23 (multi-core) benchmark. The benchmark result is divided by the average energy required (CPU package power in watts). The higher the value, the more efficient the CPU is under full load.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9820
2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14,771 CB R23 MC @ 66 W |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Samsung Exynos 9820 | Intel Core Ultra 5 135H |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Galaxy S10+ |
Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
