Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Intel Processor N97
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Samsung Exynos 9609
20 %
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Intel Processor N97
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Alder Lake)
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
118 entries
118 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Intel Processor N97 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Samsung Exynos (49) | Intel Processor N (9) |
| CPU group | Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) | Intel Processor N50/N100/N200 (5) |
| Architecture | Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 | Alder Lake N |
| Technology | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Intel Processor N97 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | normal |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x Cortex-A73 2.20 GHz |
4x Gracemont 2.00 - 3.60 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Cortex-A53 1.60 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 6.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Intel Processor N97 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 | Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Alder Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz | 1.20 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 3 / 48 | 24 / 192 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Technology | 16 nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q3/2017 | Q1/2023 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Intel Processor N97 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Intel Processor N97 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4X-1600 | LPDDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| Memory channels | 0 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 9 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Intel Processor N97 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 12 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 9609 | Intel Processor N97 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Android | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2 | |
| Release date | Q2/2019 | Q1/2023 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Samsung Exynos 9609 is 5.0 stars (1 ratings), while Intel Processor N97 has received 4.1 stars (228 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
8
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
9
Intel Processor N97
4C / 4T · 3.60 GHz
Popular Comparisons
