Samsung Exynos 9609 vs AMD A4-6210
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Samsung Exynos 9609 | AMD A4-6210 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Samsung Exynos 9609 and the AMD A4-6210 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Samsung Exynos 9609 8 core processor released in Q2/2019 with the AMD A4-6210 which has 4 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2014. |
||
| Samsung Exynos (47) | Family | AMD A (112) |
| Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) | CPU group | AMD A4-6000 (3) |
| 3 | Generation | 3 |
| Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Richland (Piledriver) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Samsung Exynos 9609 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.20 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The AMD A4-6210 clocks with 1.80 GHz, has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 9609 | Characteristic | AMD A4-6210 |
| 8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 4 |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.20 GHz 4x Cortex-A73 |
A-Core | 1.80 GHz |
| 1.60 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
B-Core | -- |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| ARM Mali-G72 MP3 | GPU | AMD Radeon R3 (Beema) |
| 0.85 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.60 GHz |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Bifrost 2 | GPU Generation | 6 |
| 16 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| 1 | Max. displays | 2 |
| 3 | Compute units | 2 |
| 48 | Shader | 128 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 2 GB | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-G72 MP3 | GPU | AMD Radeon R3 (Beema) |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 0 memory channels is supported by the Samsung Exynos 9609, while the AMD A4-6210 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s enabled. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 9609 | Characteristic | AMD A4-6210 |
| LPDDR4X-1600 | Memory | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 0 | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe Samsung Exynos 9609 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the AMD A4-6210 is 15 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 9609 | Characteristic | AMD A4-6210 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 15 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Samsung Exynos 9609 has 0.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 10 nm. The cache of AMD A4-6210 is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 32 nm. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 9609 | Characteristic | AMD A4-6210 |
| 10 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Unknown |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 |
| -- | Socket | AM1 |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2019 | Release date | Q2/2014 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 1.80 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
AMD A4-6210
4C 4T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A4-6210
4C 4T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A4-6210
AMD Radeon R3 (Beema) @ 0.60 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A4-6210
4C 4T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A4-6210
4C 4T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Samsung Exynos 9609 | AMD A4-6210 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
