Samsung Exynos 7580 vs Intel Celeron 3865U

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 7580 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Celeron 3865U
Samsung Exynos 7580 Intel Celeron 3865U

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Samsung Exynos 7580 and the Intel Celeron 3865U and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Samsung Exynos 7580 8 core processor released in Q2/2015 with the Intel Celeron 3865U which has 2 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2017.
Samsung Exynos (46) Family Intel Celeron (165)
Samsung Exynos 7578/7580 (2) CPU group Intel Celeron 3000 (10)
1 Generation 7
Cortex-A53 Architecture Kaby Lake U
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 7580 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.60 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The Intel Celeron 3865U clocks with 1.80 GHz, has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel.

Samsung Exynos 7580 Characteristic Intel Celeron 3865U
8 Cores 2
8 Threads 2
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
1.60 GHz Frequency 1.80 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) --
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Samsung Exynos 7580 Characteristic Intel Celeron 3865U
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

ARM Mali-T720 MP2 GPU Intel HD Graphics 610
0.65 GHz GPU frequency 0.30 GHz
0.65 GHz GPU (Turbo) 0.90 GHz
Midgard 3 GPU Generation 9.5
28nm Technology 14 nm
2 Max. displays 3
2 Compute units 12
32 Shader 96
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 32 GB
11 DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-T720 MP2 GPU Intel HD Graphics 610
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 0 memory channels is supported by the Samsung Exynos 7580, while the Intel Celeron 3865U supports a maximum of 32 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 34.1 GB/s enabled.

Samsung Exynos 7580 Characteristic Intel Celeron 3865U
LPDDR3-933 Memory LPDDR3-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600
Max. Memory 32 GB
0 Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 34.1 GB/s
No ECC No
2.00 MB L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 2.00 MB
-- PCIe version 2.0
-- PCIe lanes 10
-- PCIe Bandwidth 5.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The Samsung Exynos 7580 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the Intel Celeron 3865U is 15 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Samsung Exynos 7580 Characteristic Intel Celeron 3865U
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 15 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down 10 W
-- Tjunction max. 100 °C

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 7580 has 2.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 28 nm. The cache of Intel Celeron 3865U is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 14 nm.

Samsung Exynos 7580 Characteristic Intel Celeron 3865U
28 nm Technology 14 nm
Unknown Chip design Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2
-- Socket BGA 1356
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q2/2015 Release date Q1/2017
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 7580 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 1.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Celeron 3865U to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (2 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 7580 (22%)
Intel Celeron 3865U (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 7580 (56%)
Intel Celeron 3865U (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 7580 Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz
106 (22%)
Intel Celeron 3865U Intel Celeron 3865U
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz
480 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 7580 Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz
399 (43%)
Intel Celeron 3865U Intel Celeron 3865U
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz
936 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Samsung Exynos 7580 Samsung Exynos 7580
ARM Mali-T720 MP2 @ 0.65 GHz
22 (13%)
Intel Celeron 3865U Intel Celeron 3865U
Intel HD Graphics 610 @ 0.90 GHz
173 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Samsung Exynos 7580 Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz
879 (68%)
Intel Celeron 3865U Intel Celeron 3865U
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz
1290 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Samsung Exynos 7580 Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron 3865U Intel Celeron 3865U
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz
389 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Samsung Exynos 7580 Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron 3865U Intel Celeron 3865U
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz
674 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
Samsung Exynos 7580 Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron 3865U Intel Celeron 3865U
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz
385 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 7580 Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron 3865U Intel Celeron 3865U
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz
71 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 7580 Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron 3865U Intel Celeron 3865U
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz
139 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 7580 Intel Celeron 3865U
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Celeron 3865UIntel Celeron J4125 Intel Celeron 3865U vs Intel Celeron J4125
2. Intel Celeron J1900Intel Celeron 3865U Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Celeron 3865U
3. Intel Celeron N4000Intel Celeron 3865U Intel Celeron N4000 vs Intel Celeron 3865U
4. Intel Celeron 3865UIntel Celeron J3455 Intel Celeron 3865U vs Intel Celeron J3455
5. Intel Celeron 3865UIntel Core i3-7100U Intel Celeron 3865U vs Intel Core i3-7100U
6. Intel Celeron N4100Intel Celeron 3865U Intel Celeron N4100 vs Intel Celeron 3865U
7. Intel Celeron 3865UIntel Celeron J3160 Intel Celeron 3865U vs Intel Celeron J3160
8. Intel Celeron 3865UIntel Celeron 3965U Intel Celeron 3865U vs Intel Celeron 3965U
9. Intel Celeron 3865UIntel Celeron 3855U Intel Celeron 3865U vs Intel Celeron 3855U
10. Intel Celeron J4105Intel Celeron 3865U Intel Celeron J4105 vs Intel Celeron 3865U


back to index