Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 2200 CPU1 vs CPU2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G

CPU comparison

Samsung Exynos 2200 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. Up to 12 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 2200 was released in Q1/2022.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to 8 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G was released in Q4/2020.
Samsung Exynos (47) Family Qualcomm Snapdragon (102)
Samsung Exynos 2200 (1) CPU group Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 (1)
6 Generation 8
Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510 Architecture Kryo 560
Mobile Segment Mobile
Samsung Exynos 2100 Predecessor --
-- Successor Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is 2.80 GHz while the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G is at 2.00 GHz.

Samsung Exynos 2200 Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
8 Cores 8
8 Threads 8
hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.80 GHz
1x Cortex-X2
A-Core 2.00 GHz
2x Kryo 560 Gold
2.52 GHz
3x Cortex-A710
B-Core 1.70 GHz
6x Kryo 560 Silver
1.82 GHz
4x Cortex-A510
C-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Samsung Exynos 2200 Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
-- AI hardware Qualcomm AI engine
-- AI specifications Hexagon 692 @ 5 TOPS

Internal Graphics

The Samsung Exynos 2200 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU Qualcomm Adreno 619L
1.30 GHz GPU frequency 0.95 GHz
1.30 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
1 GPU Generation 6
4 nm Technology 8 nm
0 Max. displays 0
24 Compute units --
384 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
4 GB Max. GPU Memory --
12 DirectX Version 12.1

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU Qualcomm Adreno 619L
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 Decode
No Codec VP8 Decode
Decode Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode
No Codec VC-1 Decode
No Codec JPEG Decode

Memory & PCIe

The Samsung Exynos 2200 can use up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G supports up to 8 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 14.9 GB/s.

Samsung Exynos 2200 Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
LPDDR5-6400 Memory LPDDR4X-3733
12 GB Max. Memory 8 GB
4 (Quad Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
51.2 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 14.9 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is --, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

Samsung Exynos 2200 Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 2200 is manufactured in 4 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G is manufactured in 8 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache.

Samsung Exynos 2200 Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
4 nm Technology 8 nm
Unknown Chip design Chiplet
Armv9-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions --
-- Socket --
None Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
Android Operating systems Android
Q1/2022 Release date Q4/2020
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 2200 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.6 stars (24 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 2200 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G (52%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 2200 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G (46%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1182 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
585 (49%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3586 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
1672 (47%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1428 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
779 (55%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3528 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
1833 (52%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
917364 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
345622 (38%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 1.30 GHz
1422 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
Qualcomm Adreno 619L @ 0.95 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 10 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 10 benchmark is one of the best-known benchmarks for mobile processors, which is now available in version 10. There is a version for Android-based smartphones and tablets, as well as a version for Apple mobile devices, i.e. iPhones and iPads.

The Antutu 10 benchmark has 3 phases. In the first phase, the device's RAM is tested, in phase 2 the graphics are tested and in the final phase the entire device is pushed to its performance limits by rendering 3D graphics.

Antutu 10 is therefore ideal for comparing the performance of different devices.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1128320 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
288736 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
3866 (100%)

Performance for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
5 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
OnePlus Nord N10

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
2. Samsung Exynos 2200Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 720G Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 835 Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 845 Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 765G Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
9. Samsung Exynos 2200Samsung Exynos 990 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 990
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 750G Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G


back to index