Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
MediaTek MT6572M vs Intel Core i5-4670
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
MediaTek MT6572M
1 %
ARM Mali-400
Intel Core i5-4670
100 %
Intel HD Graphics 4600
More benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
213 entries
213 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
190 entries
190 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6572M | Intel Core i5-4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Mediatek MT-Serie (72) | Intel Core i5 (336) |
| CPU group | MediaTek MT65xx A7 (14) | Intel Core i 4000 (64) |
| Architecture | Cortex-A9 | Haswell S |
| Technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 1150 | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6572M | Intel Core i5-4670 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x Cortex-A7 | 4x |
| Frequency: | 1.00 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.80 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.60 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 6.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6572M | Intel Core i5-4670 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-400 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
| GPU frequency | 0.40 - 0.40 GHz | 0.35 - 1.20 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 1 / 16 | 20 / 160 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | |
| Technology | 28nm | 22 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2008 | Q2/2013 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6572M | Intel Core i5-4670 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6572M | Intel Core i5-4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR2 | DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 32 GB | |
| Memory channels | 0 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6572M | Intel Core i5-4670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 84 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6572M | Intel Core i5-4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Android | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | Armv7-A (32 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | |
| Release date | 2013 | Q2/2013 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of MediaTek MT6572M is 0 stars (0 ratings), while Intel Core i5-4670 has received 3.9 stars (15 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
4
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
5
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
7
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
8
Intel Core i5-4670
4C / 4T · 3.80 GHz
9
MediaTek MT6572M
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
