MediaTek MT6572 vs Intel Celeron E3400
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| MediaTek MT6572 | Intel Celeron E3400 | |
CPU comparisonMediaTek MT6572 or Intel Celeron E3400 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The MediaTek MT6572 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.40 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The MediaTek MT6572 was released in Q2/2013. The Intel Celeron E3400 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron E3400 was released in Q1/2010. |
||
| Mediatek MT-Serie (72) | Family | Intel Celeron (165) |
| MediaTek MT65xx A7 (14) | CPU group | Intel Celeron E3000 (3) |
| 1 | Generation | 1 |
| Cortex-A9 | Architecture | Wolfdale (Penryn) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe MediaTek MT6572 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the MediaTek MT6572 is 1.40 GHz while the Intel Celeron E3400 has 2 CPU cores and 2 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron E3400 is at 2.60 GHz. |
||
| MediaTek MT6572 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron E3400 |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 1.40 GHz | Frequency | 2.60 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe MediaTek MT6572 or Intel Celeron E3400 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| ARM Mali-400 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.50 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 0.50 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Utgard | GPU Generation | -- |
| 28nm | Technology | |
| 1 | Max. displays | |
| 1 | Compute units | -- |
| 16 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 0 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-400 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe MediaTek MT6572 can use up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The Intel Celeron E3400 supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 17.1 GB/s. |
||
| MediaTek MT6572 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron E3400 |
| LPDDR2 | Memory | DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| 0 | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the MediaTek MT6572 is --, while the Intel Celeron E3400 has a TDP of 65 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| MediaTek MT6572 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron E3400 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 65 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe MediaTek MT6572 is manufactured in 28 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The Intel Celeron E3400 is manufactured in 45 nm and has a 1.00 MB cache. |
||
| MediaTek MT6572 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron E3400 |
| 28 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| Armv7-A (32 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 |
| -- | Socket | LGA 775 |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2013 | Release date | Q1/2010 |
| -- | Release price | 42 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
MediaTek MT6572
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
ARM Mali-400 @ 0.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron E3400
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| MediaTek MT6572 | Intel Celeron E3400 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
