MediaTek Helio X25 vs AMD EPYC 9745
Last updated:
 |
Note: The information shown below is based on a pre-sample. Technical details or benchmark results may be different in the final version of this processor. |
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| MediaTek Helio X25 | AMD EPYC 9745 | |
CPU comparisonMediaTek Helio X25 or AMD EPYC 9745 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The MediaTek Helio X25 has 10 cores with 10 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz. Up to 4 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The MediaTek Helio X25 was released in Q4/2015. The AMD EPYC 9745 has 128 cores with 256 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9745 was released in Q4/2024. |
||
| Mediatek Helio (37) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| MediaTek Helio X20 (4) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 9005 (21) |
| 2 | Generation | 5 |
| Cortex-A72 / Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Turin (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe MediaTek Helio X25 is a 10 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz. The AMD EPYC 9745 has 128 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz. |
||
| MediaTek Helio X25 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9745 |
| 10 | Cores | 128 |
| 10 | Threads | 256 |
| hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.50 GHz 2x Cortex-A72 |
A-Core | 2.30 GHz 128x Zen 5 |
| 1.55 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
B-Core | -- |
| -- 4x Cortex-A53 |
C-Core | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| ARM Mali-T880 MP4 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.85 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 0.85 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Midgard 4 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 16 nm | Technology | |
| 2 | Max. displays | |
| 4 | Compute units | -- |
| 64 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 11 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-T880 MP4 | GPU | no iGPU |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe MediaTek Helio X25 supports a maximum of 4 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9745 can connect up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. |
||
| MediaTek Helio X25 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9745 |
| LPDDR3-800 | Memory | DDR5-6000 |
| 4 GB | Max. Memory | 6144 GB |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 12 |
| 6.4 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 480.0 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 512.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 5.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 504.1 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The MediaTek Helio X25 has a TDP of --, that of the AMD EPYC 9745 is 400 W. |
||
| MediaTek Helio X25 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9745 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 400 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe MediaTek Helio X25 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the AMD EPYC 9745 cache has a total of 512.00 MB. |
||
| MediaTek Helio X25 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9745 |
| 20 nm | Technology | 4 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI |
| -- | Socket | SP5 |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 |
| Q4/2015 | Release date | Q4/2024 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
10C 10T @ 2.50 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
128C 256T @ 2.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
MediaTek Helio X25
10C 10T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 9745
128C 256T @ 2.30 GHzNot verified |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
MediaTek Helio X25
10C 10T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9745
128C 256T @ 2.30 GHzNot verified |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
MediaTek Helio X25
ARM Mali-T880 MP4 @ 0.85 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9745
@ 0.00 GHzNot verified |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
MediaTek Helio X25
10C 10T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9745
128C 256T @ 2.30 GHzNot verified |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
MediaTek Helio X25
10C 10T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9745
128C 256T @ 2.30 GHzNot verified |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| MediaTek Helio X25 | AMD EPYC 9745 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
