MediaTek Helio P95 vs AMD E-240
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| MediaTek Helio P95 | AMD E-240 | |
CPU comparisonMediaTek Helio P95 or AMD E-240 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The MediaTek Helio P95 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. Up to 8 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The MediaTek Helio P95 was released in Q1/2020. The AMD E-240 has 1 cores with 1 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.50 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The AMD E-240 was released in Q1/2011. |
||
| Mediatek Helio (37) | Family | AMD E (23) |
| MediaTek Helio P65/P90/P95 (3) | CPU group | AMD E/E1/E2-1000 (5) |
| 3 | Generation | 1 |
| Cortex-A75 / Cortex-A55 | Architecture | Zacate (Bobcat) |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| MediaTek Helio P90 | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe MediaTek Helio P95 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the MediaTek Helio P95 is 2.20 GHz while the AMD E-240 has 1 CPU cores and 1 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD E-240 is at 1.50 GHz. |
||
| MediaTek Helio P95 | Characteristic | AMD E-240 |
| 8 | Cores | 1 |
| 8 | Threads | 1 |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.20 GHz 2x Cortex-A75 |
A-Core | 1.50 GHz |
| 2.00 GHz 6x Cortex-A55 |
B-Core | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The MediaTek Helio P95 or AMD E-240 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| PowerVR GM 9446 | GPU | AMD Radeon HD 6310 |
| 0.95 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.49 GHz |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 1 | GPU Generation | 3 |
| 12 | Technology | 40 nm |
| 0 | Max. displays | 2 |
| 3 | Compute units | 1 |
| 12 | Shader | 80 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 2 GB | Max. GPU Memory | 1 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| PowerVR GM 9446 | GPU | AMD Radeon HD 6310 |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe MediaTek Helio P95 can use up to 8 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 14.9 GB/s. The AMD E-240 supports up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 8.5 GB/s. |
||
| MediaTek Helio P95 | Characteristic | AMD E-240 |
| LPDDR4X-1866 | Memory | DDR3-1066 |
| 8 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 1 (Single Channel) |
| 14.9 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 8.5 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the MediaTek Helio P95 is --, while the AMD E-240 has a TDP of 18 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| MediaTek Helio P95 | Characteristic | AMD E-240 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 18 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe MediaTek Helio P95 is manufactured in 12 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The AMD E-240 is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 1.00 MB cache. |
||
| MediaTek Helio P95 | Characteristic | AMD E-240 |
| 12 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Unknown |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX |
| -- | Socket | BGA 413 |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | |
| Q1/2020 | Release date | Q1/2011 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
1C 1T @ 1.50 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
MediaTek Helio P95
PowerVR GM 9446 @ 0.95 GHz |
||
|
AMD E-240
AMD Radeon HD 6310 @ 0.49 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
MediaTek Helio P95
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD E-240
1C 1T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
MediaTek Helio P95
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD E-240
1C 1T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
MediaTek Helio P95
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD E-240
1C 1T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
MediaTek Helio P95
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD E-240
1C 1T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| MediaTek Helio P95 | AMD E-240 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
