Intel Celeron N2810 vs AMD E-240

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Celeron N2810 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD E-240
Intel Celeron N2810 AMD E-240

CPU comparison

Intel Celeron N2810 or AMD E-240 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Intel Celeron N2810 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. Up to 8 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron N2810 was released in Q4/2013.

The AMD E-240 has 1 cores with 1 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.50 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The AMD E-240 was released in Q1/2011.
Intel Celeron (165) Family AMD E (23)
Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 (17) CPU group AMD E/E1/E2-1000 (5)
6 Generation 1
Bay Trail Architecture Zacate (Bobcat)
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Celeron N2810 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz. The AMD E-240 has 1 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.50 GHz.

Intel Celeron N2810 Characteristic AMD E-240
2 Cores 1
2 Threads 1
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.00 GHz Frequency 1.50 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) --
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Intel Celeron N2810 Characteristic AMD E-240
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) GPU AMD Radeon HD 6310
0.31 GHz GPU frequency 0.49 GHz
0.76 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
7 GPU Generation 3
22 nm Technology 40 nm
2 Max. displays 2
4 Compute units 1
32 Shader 80
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
2 GB Max. GPU Memory 1 GB
11.2 DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) GPU AMD Radeon HD 6310
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC Decode
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The Intel Celeron N2810 supports a maximum of 8 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD E-240 can connect up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels.

Intel Celeron N2810 Characteristic AMD E-240
DDR3-1066 Memory DDR3-1066
8 GB Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 1 (Single Channel)
17.1 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
1.00 MB L3 Cache 1.00 MB
2.0 PCIe version --
4 PCIe lanes --
2.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Celeron N2810 has a TDP of 7.5 W, that of the AMD E-240 is 18 W.

Intel Celeron N2810 Characteristic AMD E-240
7.5 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 18 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
4.5 W TDP down --
100 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Celeron N2810 has a 1.00 MB cache, while the AMD E-240 cache has a total of 1.00 MB.

Intel Celeron N2810 Characteristic AMD E-240
22 nm Technology 32 nm
Monolithic Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2 ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
BGA 1170 Socket BGA 413
VT-x, VT-x EPT Virtualization AMD-V
No AES-NI Yes
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems
Q4/2013 Release date Q1/2011
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Celeron N2810 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD E-240 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Celeron N2810 Intel Celeron N2810
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.76 GHz
48 (61%)
AMD E-240 AMD E-240
AMD Radeon HD 6310 @ 0.49 GHz
79 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Celeron N2810 Intel Celeron N2810
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz
418 (100%)
AMD E-240 AMD E-240
1C 1T @ 1.50 GHz
371 (89%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron N2810 Intel Celeron N2810
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz
189 (100%)
AMD E-240 AMD E-240
1C 1T @ 1.50 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron N2810 Intel Celeron N2810
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz
318 (100%)
AMD E-240 AMD E-240
1C 1T @ 1.50 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron N2810 Intel Celeron N2810
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz
31 (100%)
AMD E-240 AMD E-240
1C 1T @ 1.50 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron N2810 Intel Celeron N2810
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz
61 (100%)
AMD E-240 AMD E-240
1C 1T @ 1.50 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Celeron N2810 AMD E-240
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Celeron N2810Intel Celeron J1900 Intel Celeron N2810 vs Intel Celeron J1900
2. AMD E-240Intel Core2 Duo E6700 AMD E-240 vs Intel Core2 Duo E6700
3. Intel Atom C2350AMD E-240 Intel Atom C2350 vs AMD E-240
4. AMD E-240AMD E-350 AMD E-240 vs AMD E-350
5. Intel Core i3-3210AMD E-240 Intel Core i3-3210 vs AMD E-240
6. Intel Celeron N2810Intel Celeron N2840 Intel Celeron N2810 vs Intel Celeron N2840
7. AMD E-240Intel Core i7-6650U AMD E-240 vs Intel Core i7-6650U
8. AMD E-240Intel Celeron J1900 AMD E-240 vs Intel Celeron J1900
9. AMD C-50Intel Celeron N2810 AMD C-50 vs Intel Celeron N2810
10. Intel Celeron N2810AMD E-240 Intel Celeron N2810 vs AMD E-240


back to index