Intel Xeon W-3275 vs AMD Phenom II X4 B99
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon W-3275 | AMD Phenom II X4 B99 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon W-3275 or AMD Phenom II X4 B99 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon W-3275 has 28 cores with 56 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.60 GHz. Up to 1024 GB of memory is supported in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-3275 was released in Q2/2019. The AMD Phenom II X4 B99 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Phenom II X4 B99 was released in Q2/2010. |
||
| Intel Xeon W (83) | Family | AMD Phenom II (52) |
| Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 (17) | CPU group | AMD Phenom II - 800/900 (23) |
| 7 | Generation | 4 |
| Cascade Lake W | Architecture | Deneb (K10) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| Intel Xeon W-3175X | Predecessor | -- |
| Intel Xeon W-3375 | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon W-3275 has 28 CPU cores and can calculate 56 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon W-3275 is 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) while the AMD Phenom II X4 B99 has 4 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD Phenom II X4 B99 is at 3.30 GHz. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3275 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 B99 |
| 28 | Cores | 4 |
| 56 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 2.50 GHz | Frequency | 3.30 GHz |
| 4.60 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 3.40 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon W-3275 can use up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 140.7 GB/s. The AMD Phenom II X4 B99 supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 21.3 GB/s. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3275 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 B99 |
| DDR4-2933 | Memory | DDR3-1333, DDR2-1066 |
| 1024 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 6 (Hexa Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 140.7 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 38.50 MB | L3 Cache | 6.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 64 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 63.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon W-3275 is 205 W, while the AMD Phenom II X4 B99 has a TDP of 95 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3275 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 B99 |
| 205 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 95 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon W-3275 is manufactured in 14 nm and has 38.50 MB cache. The AMD Phenom II X4 B99 is manufactured in 45 nm and has a 6.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3275 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 B99 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | SSE3, SSE4a |
| LGA 3647 | Socket | AM3 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2019 | Release date | Q2/2010 |
| 4250 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
28C 56T @ 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
AMD Phenom II X4 B99
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 B99
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 B99
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 B99
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 B99
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 B99
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 B99
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 B99
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 B99
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 B99
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon W-3275 | AMD Phenom II X4 B99 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
