Intel Xeon W-3265M vs HiSilicon Kirin 925
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon W-3265M | HiSilicon Kirin 925 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon W-3265M or HiSilicon Kirin 925 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon W-3265M has 24 cores with 48 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.60 GHz. Up to 2048 GB of memory is supported in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-3265M was released in Q2/2019. The HiSilicon Kirin 925 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 925 was released in Q3/2014. |
||
| Intel Xeon W (83) | Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 (17) | CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 920 (3) |
| 7 | Generation | 2 |
| Cascade Lake W | Architecture | Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon W-3265M is a 24 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.70 GHz (4.60 GHz). The HiSilicon Kirin 925 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.80 GHz. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3265M | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
| 24 | Cores | 8 |
| 48 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.70 GHz (4.60 GHz) | A-Core | 1.80 GHz 4x Cortex-A15 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.30 GHz 4x Cortex-A7 |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.60 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Midgard 2 |
| Technology | 32nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 4 |
| -- | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP4 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon W-3265M supports a maximum of 2048 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 925 can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3265M | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
| DDR4-2933 | Memory | LPDDR3-1600 |
| 2048 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 6 (Hexa Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 140.7 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 33.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 64 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 63.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Xeon W-3265M has a TDP of 205 W, that of the HiSilicon Kirin 925 is --. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3265M | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
| 205 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon W-3265M has a 33.00 MB cache, while the HiSilicon Kirin 925 cache has a total of 0.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3265M | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 3647 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q2/2019 | Release date | Q3/2014 |
| 6350 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
24C 48T @ 2.70 GHz (4.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon W-3265M
24C 48T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3265M
24C 48T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3265M
24C 48T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3265M
24C 48T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3265M
24C 48T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3265M
24C 48T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3265M
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
ARM Mali-T628 MP4 @ 0.60 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3265M
24C 48T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon W-3265M | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
| Apple Mac Pro (2019) | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
