Intel Xeon W-3245 | Samsung Exynos 2200 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon W-3245 or Samsung Exynos 2200 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon W-3245 has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.60 GHz. Up to 1024 GB of memory is supported in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-3245 was released in Q2/2019. The Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 2200 was released in Q1/2022. |
||
Intel Xeon W (83) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 (17) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 2200 (1) |
7 | Generation | 6 |
Cascade Lake W | Architecture | Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510 |
Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
-- | Predecessor | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
Intel Xeon W-3345 | Successor | -- |
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon W-3245 has 16 CPU cores and can calculate 32 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon W-3245 is 3.20 GHz (4.60 GHz) while the Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is at 2.80 GHz. |
||
Intel Xeon W-3245 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
normal | Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking ? | No |
3.20 GHz (4.60 GHz) | A-Core | 2.80 GHz 1x Cortex-X2 |
-- | B-Core | 2.52 GHz 3x Cortex-A710 |
-- | C-Core | 1.82 GHz 4x Cortex-A510 |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The Intel Xeon W-3245 or Samsung Exynos 2200 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
no iGPU | GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
GPU frequency | 1.30 GHz | |
-- | GPU (Turbo) | 1.30 GHz |
-- | GPU Generation | 1 |
Technology | 4 nm | |
Max. displays | 0 | |
-- | Compute units | 24 |
-- | Shader | 384 |
No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
No | Frame Generation | No |
-- | Max. GPU Memory | 4 GB |
-- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
no iGPU | GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec VP8 | No |
No | Codec AV1 | Decode |
No | Codec AVC | No |
No | Codec VC-1 | No |
No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon W-3245 can use up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 140.7 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 2200 supports up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s. |
||
Intel Xeon W-3245 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
DDR4-2933 | Memory | LPDDR5-6400 |
1024 GB | Max. Memory | 12 GB |
6 (Hexa Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
140.7 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
Yes | ECC | No |
-- | L2 Cache | -- |
22.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
64 | PCIe lanes | -- |
63.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon W-3245 is 205 W, while the Samsung Exynos 2200 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
Intel Xeon W-3245 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
205 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
-- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
-- | TDP up | -- |
-- | TDP down | -- |
-- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon W-3245 is manufactured in 14 nm and has 22.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 2200 is manufactured in 4 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache. |
||
Intel Xeon W-3245 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
14 nm | Technology | 4 nm |
Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv9-A (64 bit) |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | -- |
LGA 3647 | Socket | -- |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
Yes | AES-NI | No |
Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
Q2/2019 | Release date | Q1/2022 |
1990 $ | Release price | -- |
show more data | show more data | |
Intel Xeon W-3245
16C 32T @ 4.60 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Xeon W-3245
16C 32T @ 4.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Xeon W-3245
16C 32T @ 4.60 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Xeon W-3245
16C 32T @ 4.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Xeon W-3245
16C 32T @ 4.60 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Xeon W-3245
16C 32T @ 4.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Xeon W-3245
@ 0.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 1.30 GHz |
Intel Xeon W-3245
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Xeon W-3245
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Xeon W-3245
16C 32T @ 4.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Devices using this processor |
|
Intel Xeon W-3245 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
Apple Mac Pro (2019) | Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra |