Intel Xeon W-3175X vs Intel Core i9-13900F

Last updated: 2023-12-08

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Xeon W-3175X		Intel Core i9-13900F
CPU comparison Intel Xeon W-3175X or Intel Core i9-13900F - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results. The Intel Xeon W-3175X has 28 cores with 56 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. Up to 512 GB of memory is supported in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-3175X was released in Q4/2018. The Intel Core i9-13900F has 24 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 5.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to 192 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core i9-13900F was released in Q1/2023.

Intel Xeon W (83)	Family	Intel Core i9 (78)
Intel Xeon W-2100/3100 (15)	CPU group	Intel Core i 13000 (17)
6	Generation	13
Skylake W	Architecture	Raptor Lake S
Desktop / Server	Segment	Desktop / Server
--	Predecessor	Intel Core i9-12900F
Intel Xeon W-3275	Successor	Intel Core i9-14900F

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The Intel Xeon W-3175X is a 28 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.10 GHz (3.80 GHz). The Intel Core i9-13900F has 24 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz (5.60 GHz).
Intel Xeon W-3175X	Characteristic	Intel Core i9-13900F
28	Cores	24
56	Threads	32
normal	Core architecture	hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes	Hyperthreading	Yes
Yes	Overclocking ?	No
3.10 GHz (3.80 GHz)	A-Core	2.00 GHz (5.60 GHz) 8x Raptor Cove
--	B-Core	1.50 GHz (4.20 GHz) 16x Gracemont

NPU AI performance The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.
Intel Xeon W-3175X	Characteristic	Intel Core i9-13900F
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--
--	NPU + CPU + iGPU	--

Integrated graphics (iGPU) The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
	GPU frequency	--
--	GPU (Turbo)	--
--	GPU Generation	--
	Technology
	Max. displays
--	Compute units	--
--	Shader	--
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
--	Max. GPU Memory	--
--	DirectX Version	--

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No
No	Codec h264	No
No	Codec VP9	No
No	Codec VP8	No
No	Codec AV1	No
No	Codec AVC	No
No	Codec VC-1	No
No	Codec JPEG	No

Memory & PCIe The Intel Xeon W-3175X supports a maximum of 512 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The Intel Core i9-13900F can connect up to 192 GB of memory in 2 memory channels.
Intel Xeon W-3175X	Characteristic	Intel Core i9-13900F
DDR4-2666	Memory	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
512 GB	Max. Memory	192 GB
6 (Hexa Channel)	Memory channels	2 (Dual Channel)
128.1 GB/s	Max. Bandwidth	89.6 GB/s
Yes	ECC	Yes
--	L2 Cache	32.00 MB
38.50 MB	L3 Cache	36.00 MB
3.0	PCIe version	5.0
48	PCIe lanes	20
47.3 GB/s	PCIe Bandwidth	78.8 GB/s
Thermal Management The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Xeon W-3175X has a TDP of 255 W, that of the Intel Core i9-13900F is 65 W.
Intel Xeon W-3175X	Characteristic	Intel Core i9-13900F
255 W	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	65 W
--	TDP (PL2)	219 W
--	TDP up	--
--	TDP down	--
85 °C	Tjunction max.	100 °C
Technical details The Intel Xeon W-3175X has a 38.50 MB cache, while the Intel Core i9-13900F cache has a total of 68.00 MB.

Intel Xeon W-3175X	Characteristic	Intel Core i9-13900F
14 nm	Technology	10 nm
Monolithic	Chip design	Monolithic
x86-64 (64 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512	ISA extensions	SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
LGA 3647	Socket	LGA 1700
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d	Virtualization	VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Yes	AES-NI	Yes
Windows 10, Linux	Operating systems	Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Q4/2018	Release date	Q1/2023
2999 $	Release price	524 $

show more data		show more data

Intel Xeon W-3175X 28C 56T @ 3.10 GHz (3.80 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save! Intel Core i9-13900F 24C 32T @ 2.00 GHz (5.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 5 CPU benchmarks

Intel Xeon W-3175X (53%)

Intel Core i9-13900F (100%)

⌀ Multi core performance in 6 CPU benchmarks

Intel Xeon W-3175X (93%)

Intel Core i9-13900F (94%)

Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)

The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.


	Intel Xeon W-3175X 28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz	67 (55%)
	Intel Core i9-13900F 24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz	121 (100%)

Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.


	Intel Xeon W-3175X 28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz	1848 (100%)
	Intel Core i9-13900F 24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz	1622 (88%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Intel Xeon W-3175X 28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz	1112 (51%)
	Intel Core i9-13900F 24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz	2165 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Intel Xeon W-3175X 28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz	31350 (96%)
	Intel Core i9-13900F 24C 32T @ 5.30 GHz	32605 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Intel Xeon W-3175X 28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz	1153 (54%)
	Intel Core i9-13900F 24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz	2130 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Intel Xeon W-3175X 28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz	23465 (100%)
	Intel Core i9-13900F 24C 32T @ 5.30 GHz	19422 (83%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.


	Intel Xeon W-3175X 28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz	1546 (56%)
	Intel Core i9-13900F 24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz	2784 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.


	Intel Xeon W-3175X 28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz	17358 (94%)
	Intel Core i9-13900F 24C 32T @ 5.30 GHz	18527 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Intel Xeon W-3175X 28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz	417 (48%)
	Intel Core i9-13900F 24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz	872 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Intel Xeon W-3175X 28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz	12975 (100%)
	Intel Core i9-13900F 24C 32T @ 5.30 GHz	12375 (95%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	Intel Xeon W-3175X 28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz	37183 (69%)
	Intel Core i9-13900F 24C 32T @ 5.30 GHz	53780 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.


	Intel Xeon W-3175X 28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz	0 (0%)
	Intel Core i9-13900F 24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz	881 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.


	Intel Xeon W-3175X 28C 56T @ 3.10 GHz	0 (0%)
	Intel Core i9-13900F 24C 32T @ 2.00 GHz	10062 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Intel Xeon W-3175X 28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz	188 (100%)
	Intel Core i9-13900F 24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Intel Xeon W-3175X 28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz	5514 (100%)
	Intel Core i9-13900F 24C 32T @ 5.30 GHz	0 (0%)

Devices using this processor
Intel Xeon W-3175X	Intel Core i9-13900F
Unknown	Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs


1.		Intel Core i9-13900K vs Intel Core i9-13900F
2.		Intel Xeon W-3175X vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
3.		Intel Core i7-13700F vs Intel Core i9-13900F
4.		Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) vs Intel Xeon W-3175X
5.		AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs Intel Xeon W-3175X
6.		AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs Intel Xeon W-3175X
7.		Intel Core i9-9900K vs Intel Xeon W-3175X
8.		Intel Core i9-13900 vs Intel Core i9-13900F
9.		Intel Xeon W-3175X vs Intel Xeon W-3275
10.		Intel Core i9-13900F vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X