Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) vs Intel Xeon W-3175X
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) | Intel Xeon W-3175X | |
CPU comparisonApple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) or Intel Xeon W-3175X - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) has 20 cores with 20 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. Up to 128 GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) was released in Q1/2022. The Intel Xeon W-3175X has 28 cores with 56 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to 512 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-3175X was released in Q4/2018. |
||
| Apple M series (25) | Family | Intel Xeon W (83) |
| Apple M1 (9) | CPU group | Intel Xeon W-2100/3100 (15) |
| 1 | Generation | 6 |
| M1 | Architecture | Skylake W |
| Notebook | Segment | Enterprise / Embedded |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU) | Successor | Intel Xeon W-3275 |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) has 20 CPU cores and can calculate 20 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) is 0.60 GHz (3.20 GHz) while the Intel Xeon W-3175X has 28 CPU cores and 56 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon W-3175X is at 3.10 GHz (3.80 GHz). |
||
| Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
| 20 | Cores | 28 |
| 20 | Threads | 56 |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 0.60 GHz (3.20 GHz) 16x Firestorm |
A-Core | 3.10 GHz (3.80 GHz) |
| 0.60 GHz (2.06 GHz) 4x Icestorm |
B-Core | -- |
NPU AI performanceThe performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. |
||
| Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
| Apple Neural Engine | AI hardware | -- |
| 32 Neural cores @ 22 TOPS | AI specifications | -- |
| -- | NPU + CPU + iGPU | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) or Intel Xeon W-3175X has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| Apple M1 Ultra (64 Core) | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.39 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 1.30 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 1 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 5 nm | Technology | |
| 5 | Max. displays | |
| 1024 | Compute units | -- |
| 8192 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 64 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Apple M1 Ultra (64 Core) | GPU | no iGPU |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) can use up to 128 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 819.2 GB/s. The Intel Xeon W-3175X supports up to 512 GB of memory in 6 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 128.1 GB/s. |
||
| Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
| LPDDR5-6400 | Memory | DDR4-2666 |
| 128 GB | Max. Memory | 512 GB |
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 6 (Hexa Channel) |
| 819.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| 52.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 38.50 MB |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 48 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 47.3 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) is 60 W, while the Intel Xeon W-3175X has a TDP of 255 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
| 60 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 255 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| 120 W | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 85 °C |
Technical detailsThe Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) is manufactured in 5 nm and has 52.00 MB cache. The Intel Xeon W-3175X is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 38.50 MB cache. |
||
| Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
| 5 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| Armv8.5-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 |
| -- | Socket | LGA 3647 |
| Apple Virtualization Framework | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| macOS | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q1/2022 | Release date | Q4/2018 |
| -- | Release price | 2999 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
20C 20T @ 0.60 GHz (3.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
28C 56T @ 3.10 GHz (3.80 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 4 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 5 CPU benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a partial load benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. In the single-core test, only the fastest CPU core is measured. The test run simulates the performance in practice.
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
The practical Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark tests the system's performance under partial load. The processor's maximum power consumption is far from being used up.
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Apple M1 Ultra (64 Core) @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
AI performance (NPU)
The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is given here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher.
Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C 20T @ 0.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
| Apple Mac Studio (2022) | Unknown |
News and articles for the Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) and the Intel Xeon W-3175X
Apple M2 Pro with more CPU cores and production in 3 nm ?
Posted by Stefan on 2022-06-28
After Apple surprisingly presented the normal Apple M2 processor as the first successor to the Apple M1 already in June 2022, the Apple M2 Pro and the Apple M2 Max may follow in autumn. The difference in performance compared to the basic version could be even greater this time and range from 25 to 40 percent.
In this article we describe how Apple could realize this and why the price should also go up.
In this article we describe how Apple could realize this and why the price should also go up.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - Cinebench R23 Benchmark projection
Posted by Stefan on 2022-06-10
We give you a preview of AMD's new Zen 4 desktop processors and calculate the performance of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X top model for the new AM5 socket. The performance data and other technical details come directly from the press kit that AMD released as part of its Financial Analyst Day on June 9, 2022.
Up to 15 percent more single-core performance and 35 percent more multi-core performance of the 16-core model are realistic !
Up to 15 percent more single-core performance and 35 percent more multi-core performance of the 16-core model are realistic !
Apple M2 vs Apple M1 - What are the differences?
Posted by Stefan on 2022-06-09
During WWDC 2022 on June 6th, 2022 Apple surprisingly presented its new Apple M2 processor. This will initially be installed in a completely revised Apple MacBook Air with 13.6 inches, a even thinner form factor and new colors. Apple also updated the already known (old) Apple MacBook Pro 13.3 with touch bar.
Many leakers had counted on Apple not presenting its new second-generation M processor until the fall. But things turned out differently. And there is very likely a reason for that: the improvements in the Apple M2 are limited compared to the predecessor.
Many leakers had counted on Apple not presenting its new second-generation M processor until the fall. But things turned out differently. And there is very likely a reason for that: the improvements in the Apple M2 are limited compared to the predecessor.
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index