Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Xeon Silver 4208 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4700
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
8C / 16T · 3.20 GHz
AMD Ryzen 7 4700
100 %
8C / 16T · 4.40 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
8C / 16T · 2.30 GHz
AMD Ryzen 7 4700
100 %
8C / 16T · 3.60 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
8C / 16T · 3.20 GHz
AMD Ryzen 7 4700
100 %
8C / 16T · 4.40 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
8C / 16T · 2.30 GHz
AMD Ryzen 7 4700
100 %
8C / 16T · 3.60 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
190 entries
190 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4208 | AMD Ryzen 7 4700 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Xeon Silver (32) | AMD Ryzen 7 (79) |
| CPU group | Intel Xeon Silver 4200 (11) | AMD Ryzen 4000G (26) |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake | Renoir (Zen 2) |
| Technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 3647 | AM4 (PGA 1331) |
| Predecessor | Intel Xeon Silver 4108 | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4208 | AMD Ryzen 7 4700 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 8x | 8x Zen 2 |
| Frequency: | 2.10 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.20 GHz | 4.40 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.30 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 11.00 MB | 8.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✓ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4208 | AMD Ryzen 7 4700 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | ||
| CUs / Shader | / | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | ||
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | ||
| Release date |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4208 | AMD Ryzen 7 4700 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4208 | AMD Ryzen 7 4700 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2400 (115.2 GB/s) | DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 1024 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory channels | 6 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 48 | 3.0 x 12 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 47.3 GB/s | 11.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4208 | AMD Ryzen 7 4700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 45 W | |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4208 | AMD Ryzen 7 4700 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| Release date | Q2/2019 | Q2/2022 |
| Release price | 422 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Xeon Silver 4208 is 4.5 stars (4 ratings), while AMD Ryzen 7 4700 has received 3.8 stars (6 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
5
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
7
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
8
Intel Xeon Silver 4208
8C / 16T · 3.20 GHz
9
AMD Ryzen 7 4700
8C / 16T · 4.40 GHz
Popular Comparisons
