Intel Xeon Gold 6252 vs Samsung Exynos 980
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon Gold 6252 | Samsung Exynos 980 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Xeon Gold 6252 and the Samsung Exynos 980 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Intel Xeon Gold 6252 24 core processor released in Q2/2019 with the Samsung Exynos 980 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q4/2019. |
||
| Intel Xeon Gold (163) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5200/6200 (55) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 980 (1) |
| 2 | Generation | 4 |
| Cascade Lake | Architecture | Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon Gold 6252 is a 24 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.10 GHz (3.70 GHz). The processor can compute 48 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 980 clocks with 2.20 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. |
||
| Intel Xeon Gold 6252 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 980 |
| 24 | Cores | 8 |
| 48 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.10 GHz (3.70 GHz) | A-Core | 2.20 GHz 2x Cortex-A77 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.80 GHz 6x Cortex-A55 |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP5 |
| GPU frequency | 0.72 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.72 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Bifrost 3 |
| Technology | 7 nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 5 |
| -- | Shader | 80 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 4 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP5 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeUp to 1024 GB of memory in a maximum of 6 memory channels is supported by the Intel Xeon Gold 6252, while the Samsung Exynos 980 supports a maximum of 12 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled. |
||
| Intel Xeon Gold 6252 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 980 |
| DDR4-2933 | Memory | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| 1024 GB | Max. Memory | 12 GB |
| 6 (Hexa Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| 140.7 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| 35.75 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 48 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 47.3 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe Intel Xeon Gold 6252 has a TDP of 150 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 980 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| Intel Xeon Gold 6252 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 980 |
| 150 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon Gold 6252 has 35.75 MB cache and is manufactured in 14 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 980 is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 8 nm. |
||
| Intel Xeon Gold 6252 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 980 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 8 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 3647 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q2/2019 | Release date | Q4/2019 |
| 3660 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
24C 48T @ 2.10 GHz (3.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6252
24C 48T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6252
24C 48T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6252
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 980
ARM Mali-G76 MP5 @ 0.72 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6252
24C 48T @ 2.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6252
24C 48T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon Gold 6252 | Samsung Exynos 980 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
