Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs AMD EPYC 9374F
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | AMD EPYC 9374F | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon E5-2697 v3 or AMD EPYC 9374F - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 has 14 cores with 28 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.60 GHz. Up to 768 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 was released in Q3/2014. The AMD EPYC 9374F has 32 cores with 64 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9374F was released in Q4/2022. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5 (71) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Intel Xeon E5 v3 (32) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 9004 (21) |
| 5 | Generation | 4 |
| Haswell E | Architecture | Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | Predecessor | -- |
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4 | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 is a 14 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.60 GHz (3.60 GHz). The AMD EPYC 9374F has 32 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.85 GHz (4.30 GHz). |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9374F |
| 14 | Cores | 32 |
| 28 | Threads | 64 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.60 GHz | Frequency | 3.85 GHz |
| 3.60 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 4.30 GHz |
| 3.10 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 4.10 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 supports a maximum of 768 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9374F can connect up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9374F |
| DDR4-2133 | Memory | DDR5-4800 |
| 768 GB | Max. Memory | 6144 GB |
| 4 (Quad Channel) | Memory channels | 12 |
| 68.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | 32.00 MB |
| 35.00 MB | L3 Cache | 256.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 5.0 |
| 40 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| 39.4 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 504.1 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 has a TDP of 145 W, that of the AMD EPYC 9374F is 320 W. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9374F |
| 145 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 320 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | 400 W |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 has a 35.00 MB cache, while the AMD EPYC 9374F cache has a total of 288.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9374F |
| 22 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | ISA extensions | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI |
| LGA 2011-3 | Socket | SP5 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 |
| Q3/2014 | Release date | Q4/2022 |
| -- | Release price | 4850 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
14C 28T @ 2.60 GHz (3.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
32C 64T @ 3.85 GHz (4.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
14C 28T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
14C 28T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
14C 28T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
14C 28T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
14C 28T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
14C 28T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
14C 28T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
14C 28T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
14C 28T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | AMD EPYC 9374F |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
