Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 | Samsung Exynos 9609 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon E5-2648L v3 or Samsung Exynos 9609 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 has 12 cores with 24 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz. Up to 768 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 was released in Q3/2014. The Samsung Exynos 9609 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9609 was released in Q2/2019. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5 (71) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Xeon E5 v3 (32) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) |
| 5 | Generation | 3 |
| Haswell E | Architecture | Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 has 12 CPU cores and can calculate 24 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 is 1.80 GHz (2.50 GHz) while the Samsung Exynos 9609 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 9609 is at 2.20 GHz. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| 12 | Cores | 8 |
| 24 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.80 GHz (2.50 GHz) | A-Core | 2.20 GHz 4x Cortex-A73 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.60 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 or Samsung Exynos 9609 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | Bifrost 2 |
| Technology | 16 nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 3 |
| -- | Shader | 48 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 can use up to 768 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 68.2 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 9609 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| DDR4-2133 | Memory | LPDDR4X-1600 |
| 768 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 4 (Quad Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 68.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 30.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 40 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 39.4 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 is 75 W, while the Samsung Exynos 9609 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| 75 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 is manufactured in 22 nm and has 30.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 9609 is manufactured in 10 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| 22 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 2011-3 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2014 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
12C 24T @ 1.80 GHz (2.50 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3
12C 24T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3
12C 24T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3
12C 24T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3
12C 24T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3
12C 24T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3
12C 24T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
