Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs Samsung Exynos 980
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 | Samsung Exynos 980 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon E5-1650 v3 or Samsung Exynos 980 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 has 6 cores with 12 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. Up to 768 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 was released in Q3/2014. The Samsung Exynos 980 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 980 was released in Q4/2019. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5 (71) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Xeon E5 v3 (32) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 980 (1) |
| 5 | Generation | 4 |
| Haswell E | Architecture | Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 | Predecessor | -- |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 has 6 CPU cores and can calculate 12 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 is 3.50 GHz (3.80 GHz) while the Samsung Exynos 980 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 980 is at 2.20 GHz. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 980 |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.50 GHz (3.80 GHz) | A-Core | 2.20 GHz 2x Cortex-A77 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.80 GHz 6x Cortex-A55 |
Internal GraphicsThe Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 or Samsung Exynos 980 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP5 |
| GPU frequency | 0.72 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.72 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Bifrost 3 |
| Technology | 7 nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 5 |
| -- | Shader | 80 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 4 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP5 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 can use up to 768 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 68.2 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 980 supports up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 980 |
| DDR4-2133 | Memory | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| 768 GB | Max. Memory | 12 GB |
| 4 (Quad Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| 68.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| 15.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 40 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 39.4 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 is 140 W, while the Samsung Exynos 980 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 980 |
| 140 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 is manufactured in 22 nm and has 15.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 980 is manufactured in 8 nm and has a 2.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 980 |
| 22 nm | Technology | 8 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 2011-3 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2014 | Release date | Q4/2019 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
6C 12T @ 3.50 GHz (3.80 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
6C 12T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
6C 12T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
6C 12T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
6C 12T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 980
ARM Mali-G76 MP5 @ 0.72 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
6C 12T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
6C 12T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
6C 12T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
6C 12T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
6C 12T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
6C 12T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 | Samsung Exynos 980 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
