Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Samsung Exynos 3110

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 3110
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Samsung Exynos 3110

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 and the Samsung Exynos 3110 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 4 core processor released in Q4/2015 with the Samsung Exynos 3110 which has 1 CPU cores and was introduced in 2009.
Intel Xeon E3 (43) Family Samsung Exynos (47)
Intel Xeon E3 v5 (17) CPU group Samsung Exynos 3100 (1)
5 Generation 1
Skylake S Architecture Cortex-A8
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.60 GHz (4.00 GHz). The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 3110 clocks with 1.00 GHz, has 1 CPU cores and can calculate 1 threads in parallel.

Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 3110
4 Cores 1
8 Threads 1
normal Core architecture normal
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
3.60 GHz Frequency 1.00 GHz
4.00 GHz Turbo Frequency (1 Core) --
3.80 GHz Turbo Frequency (All Cores) --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 3110
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

no iGPU GPU PowerVR SGX540
GPU frequency 0.20 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.20 GHz
-- GPU Generation --
Technology 45nm
Max. displays 1
-- Compute units 1
-- Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version 10.1

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU PowerVR SGX540
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to 64 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5, while the Samsung Exynos 3110 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 3110
DDR4-2133 Memory LPDDR2-400
64 GB Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
34.1 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache 0.50 MB
8.00 MB L3 Cache --
3.0 PCIe version --
16 PCIe lanes --
15.8 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 has a TDP of 80 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 3110 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 3110
80 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 has 8.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 14 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 3110 is at 0.50 MB. The processor is manufactured in 45 nm.

Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 3110
14 nm Technology 45 nm
Monolithic Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv7-A (32 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 ISA extensions --
LGA 1151 Socket --
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q4/2015 Release date 2009
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (2 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 3110 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
4C 8T @ 4.00 GHz
1165 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 3110 Samsung Exynos 3110
1C 1T @ 1.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
4C 8T @ 3.80 GHz
4428 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 3110 Samsung Exynos 3110
1C 1T @ 1.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
4C 8T @ 4.00 GHz
1442 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 3110 Samsung Exynos 3110
1C 1T @ 1.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
4C 8T @ 3.80 GHz
4827 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 3110 Samsung Exynos 3110
1C 1T @ 1.00 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 3110 Samsung Exynos 3110
PowerVR SGX540 @ 0.20 GHz
3 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
4C 8T @ 3.80 GHz
8364 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 3110 Samsung Exynos 3110
1C 1T @ 1.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
4C 8T @ 4.00 GHz
172 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 3110 Samsung Exynos 3110
1C 1T @ 1.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
4C 8T @ 3.80 GHz
844 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 3110 Samsung Exynos 3110
1C 1T @ 1.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Samsung Exynos 3110
Unknown Samsung Google Nexus S
Samsung Galaxy S 4G

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5Intel Core i7-6700 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Intel Core i7-6700
2. Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5Intel Core i7-6700K Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Intel Core i7-6700K
3. Intel Xeon E3-1270 v6Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v6 vs Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
4. Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
5. Intel Core i7-7700Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Intel Core i7-7700 vs Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
6. Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5Intel Core i7-7700K Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Intel Core i7-7700K
7. Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5
8. Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
9. Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 vs Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
10. Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5


back to index