Intel Xeon D-1602 vs HiSilicon Kirin 910T
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon D-1602 | HiSilicon Kirin 910T | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon D-1602 or HiSilicon Kirin 910T - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon D-1602 has 2 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. Up to 128 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Xeon D-1602 was released in Q2/2019. The HiSilicon Kirin 910T has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 910T was released in Q1/2014. |
||
| Intel Xeon D (79) | Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| Intel Xeon D-1600 (8) | CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 910 (2) |
| 3 | Generation | 1 |
| Hewitt Lake | Architecture | Cortex-A9 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon D-1602 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon D-1602 is 2.50 GHz (3.20 GHz) while the HiSilicon Kirin 910T has 4 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 910T is at 1.80 GHz. |
||
| Intel Xeon D-1602 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 910T |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.50 GHz | Frequency | 1.80 GHz |
| 3.20 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 2.90 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The Intel Xeon D-1602 or HiSilicon Kirin 910T has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-450 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.70 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.70 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Utgard |
| Technology | 28nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 4 |
| -- | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 0 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-450 MP4 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon D-1602 can use up to 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 34.1 GB/s. The HiSilicon Kirin 910T supports up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| Intel Xeon D-1602 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 910T |
| DDR4-2133 | Memory | LPDDR3 |
| 128 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 1 (Single Channel) |
| 34.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| 3.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 32 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 31.5 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon D-1602 is 27 W, while the HiSilicon Kirin 910T has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Xeon D-1602 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 910T |
| 27 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon D-1602 is manufactured in 14 nm and has 3.00 MB cache. The HiSilicon Kirin 910T is manufactured in 28 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Xeon D-1602 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 910T |
| 14 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | ISA extensions | -- |
| BGA 1667 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q2/2019 | Release date | Q1/2014 |
| 113 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
2C 4T @ 2.50 GHz (3.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 1.80 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
Intel Xeon D-1602
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910T
ARM Mali-450 MP4 @ 0.70 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon D-1602
2C 4T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910T
4C 4T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon D-1602 | HiSilicon Kirin 910T |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
