Intel Xeon D-1602 vs AMD E-240
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon D-1602 | AMD E-240 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon D-1602 or AMD E-240 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon D-1602 has 2 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. Up to 128 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Xeon D-1602 was released in Q2/2019. The AMD E-240 has 1 cores with 1 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.50 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The AMD E-240 was released in Q1/2011. |
||
| Intel Xeon D (79) | Family | AMD E (23) |
| Intel Xeon D-1600 (8) | CPU group | AMD E/E1/E2-1000 (5) |
| 3 | Generation | 1 |
| Hewitt Lake | Architecture | Zacate (Bobcat) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon D-1602 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon D-1602 is 2.50 GHz (3.20 GHz) while the AMD E-240 has 1 CPU cores and 1 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD E-240 is at 1.50 GHz. |
||
| Intel Xeon D-1602 | Characteristic | AMD E-240 |
| 2 | Cores | 1 |
| 4 | Threads | 1 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.50 GHz | Frequency | 1.50 GHz |
| 3.20 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 2.90 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The Intel Xeon D-1602 or AMD E-240 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | AMD Radeon HD 6310 |
| GPU frequency | 0.49 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | 3 |
| Technology | 40 nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 1 |
| -- | Shader | 80 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 1 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | AMD Radeon HD 6310 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon D-1602 can use up to 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 34.1 GB/s. The AMD E-240 supports up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 8.5 GB/s. |
||
| Intel Xeon D-1602 | Characteristic | AMD E-240 |
| DDR4-2133 | Memory | DDR3-1066 |
| 128 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 1 (Single Channel) |
| 34.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 8.5 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| 3.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 32 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 31.5 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon D-1602 is 27 W, while the AMD E-240 has a TDP of 18 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Xeon D-1602 | Characteristic | AMD E-240 |
| 27 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 18 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon D-1602 is manufactured in 14 nm and has 3.00 MB cache. The AMD E-240 is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 1.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Xeon D-1602 | Characteristic | AMD E-240 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX |
| BGA 1667 | Socket | BGA 413 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | |
| Q2/2019 | Release date | Q1/2011 |
| 113 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
2C 4T @ 2.50 GHz (3.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
1C 1T @ 1.50 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
Intel Xeon D-1602
2C 4T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
AMD E-240
1C 1T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Xeon D-1602
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD E-240
AMD Radeon HD 6310 @ 0.49 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon D-1602 | AMD E-240 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
