Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Processor N100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
Last updated:
Summary
The Intel Processor N100 (Alder Lake N, 10 nm) is an energy-efficient CPU for mini-PCs and thin clients, optimized for basic tasks.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (Cortex-X2 / -A710 / -A510, 4 nm) is a powerful mobile processor for high-end smartphones, delivering high performance.
The Intel Processor N100 has 4 efficient cores, offering solid performance for everyday applications. Its Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Alder Lake) are suitable for basic graphics. The memory bandwidth is 38 GB/s; PCIe 3.0 is supported. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, with its hybrid core architecture, significantly outperforms the N100 in single and multi-core benchmarks by over 10 percent.
For gaming, the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 with its Qualcomm Adreno 725 graphics unit is clearly superior, offering performance for demanding games. The Intel Processor N100 is characterized by low power consumption, ideal for passive cooling. The Snapdragon is also efficient, but has higher energy requirements at peak performance.
The N100 offers good value for money in its segment, while the Snapdragon is a premium mobile chip. The Intel Processor N100 is ideal for energy efficiency and basic tasks. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 offers maximum performance for demanding applications and gaming.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (Cortex-X2 / -A710 / -A510, 4 nm) is a powerful mobile processor for high-end smartphones, delivering high performance.
The Intel Processor N100 has 4 efficient cores, offering solid performance for everyday applications. Its Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Alder Lake) are suitable for basic graphics. The memory bandwidth is 38 GB/s; PCIe 3.0 is supported. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, with its hybrid core architecture, significantly outperforms the N100 in single and multi-core benchmarks by over 10 percent.
For gaming, the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 with its Qualcomm Adreno 725 graphics unit is clearly superior, offering performance for demanding games. The Intel Processor N100 is characterized by low power consumption, ideal for passive cooling. The Snapdragon is also efficient, but has higher energy requirements at peak performance.
The N100 offers good value for money in its segment, while the Snapdragon is a premium mobile chip. The Intel Processor N100 is ideal for energy efficiency and basic tasks. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 offers maximum performance for demanding applications and gaming.
Intel Processor N100
- High energy efficiency and low power consumption.
- Cost-effective solution for basic computing tasks.
- Suitable for mini-PCs and embedded systems.
- Integrated Intel UHD Graphics for media playback.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
- Significantly higher single- and multi-core performance.
- Superior graphics performance for gaming (Qualcomm Adreno 725).
- Advanced 4 nm manufacturing process.
- Optimized for demanding mobile applications.
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Processor N100
82 %
4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
8C / 8T · 2.91 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Processor N100
75 %
4C / 4T · 3.00 GHz
8C / 8T · 2.91 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Processor N100
81 %
4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
8C / 8T · 2.91 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Processor N100
70 %
4C / 4T · 3.00 GHz
8C / 8T · 2.91 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Processor N100
16 %
Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Alder Lake)
Qualcomm Adreno 725
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
90 entries
90 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (SC)
250 entries
250 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
CPU performance per watt (efficiency)
140 entries
140 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Processor N (9) | Qualcomm Snapdragon (105) |
| CPU group | Intel Processor N50/N100/N200 (5) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 2 (1) |
| Architecture | Alder Lake N | Cortex-X2 / -A710 / -A510 |
| Technology | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | BGA | |
| Predecessor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x Gracemont 1.80 - 3.40 GHz |
1x Cortex-X2 2.91 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 3x Cortex-A710 2.49 GHz |
|
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Cortex-A510 1.80 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 6.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Alder Lake) | Qualcomm Adreno 725 |
| GPU frequency | 0.30 - 0.75 GHz | 0.58 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 24 / 192 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 0 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | |
| Technology | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Release date | Q1/2023 | Q1/2023 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Qualcomm AI engine | |
| AI specifications | Hexagon | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) | LPDDR5-6400 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 1 | 4 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 9 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 6 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | 25 W | |
| TDP up | 10 W | |
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Android, Windows 10/11 (ARM) |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv9-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2 | |
| Release date | Q1/2023 | Q2/2023 |
| Release price | 128 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Processor N100 is 4.0 stars (821 ratings), while Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 has received 4.2 stars (79 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Processor N100
4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
Popular Comparisons
