Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Pentium T3200 vs AMD FX-9800P
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Pentium T3200
57 %
2C / 2T · 2.00 GHz
AMD FX-9800P
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.60 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Pentium T3200
37 %
2C / 2T · 2.00 GHz
AMD FX-9800P
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.10 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium T3200 | AMD FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Pentium (150) | AMD FX (30) |
| CPU group | Intel Pentium T2000/T3000 (7) | AMD FX-9800 (2) |
| Architecture | Merom (Core) | Excavator (Bristol Ridge) |
| Technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | PGA 478 | FP4 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium T3200 | AMD FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x Core | 4x |
| Frequency: | 2.00 GHz | 2.70 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.60 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.10 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 1.00 MB | 2.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | ||
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium T3200 | AMD FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Bristol Ridge) |
| GPU frequency | 0.76 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 8 / 512 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | |
| Technology | 28 nm | |
| Release date | Q2/2016 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium T3200 | AMD FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium T3200 | AMD FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) | DDR4-1866 (29.9 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 8 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 7.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium T3200 | AMD FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35 W | 15 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C | 90 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium T3200 | AMD FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Unknown |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, FMA4 |
| Release date | Q1/2008 | Q2/2016 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Pentium T3200 is 5.0 stars (2 ratings), while AMD FX-9800P has received 3.5 stars (2 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Intel Pentium T3200
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
9
AMD FX-9800P
4C / 4T · 3.60 GHz
Popular Comparisons
