Intel Core Ultra 7 255U vs AMD Ryzen 7 250

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255U and the AMD Ryzen 7 250 are mobile processors for energy-efficient notebooks.

They offer balanced performance for everyday tasks, productivity, and light multimedia applications, optimized for battery life. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (Meteor Lake U Refresh) is manufactured in 3 nm, with a hybrid core architecture and 12 MB L2 cache. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 (Hawk Point, Zen 4) is produced in 4 nm, with 8 MB L2 and 16 MB L3 cache.

Both use hybrid architectures for efficient multitasking. In benchmarks, both processors show very comparable computing performance in single-core and multi-core applications. The differences are less than 10 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 also delivers solid performance in Cinebench 2024. For gaming, both use their integrated graphics.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255U has the Intel Iris Xe 4 Core Graphics 64 EUs (Meteor Lake). The AMD Ryzen 7 250 integrates the AMD Radeon 780M, which typically offers stronger graphics performance for light games. Both U-series processors are designed for high energy efficiency and low Thermal Design Power (TDP), ideal for long battery life in thin notebooks.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255U achieves 134 GB/s memory bandwidth, the AMD Ryzen 7 250 120 GB/s. As integrated notebook components, they are not available individually. The price-performance ratio heavily depends on the end device. AMD mobile processors often offer a strong overall package.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255U impresses with 3 nm manufacturing and high memory bandwidth. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 offers robust overall performance and superior integrated graphics. For the best integrated graphics performance, the AMD Ryzen 7 250 is recommended. For an energy-efficient system focused on productivity and state-of-the-art manufacturing, the Intel Core Ultra 7 255U is a strong option.