Intel Core Ultra 5 135H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Core Ultra 5 135H CPU1 vs CPU2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Qualcomm Snapdragon 632

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H 14 core processor released in Q4/2023 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2018.
Intel Core Ultra 5 (10) Family Qualcomm Snapdragon (102)
Intel Core Ultra 100H (5) CPU group Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (1)
1 Generation 6
Meteor Lake H Architecture Kryo 250
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a 14 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.70 GHz (4.60 GHz). The processor can compute 18 threads at the same time. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 clocks with 1.80 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
14 Cores 8
18 Threads 8
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
1.70 GHz (4.60 GHz)
4x Redwood Cove
A-Core 1.80 GHz
4x Kryo 250 Gold
1.20 GHz (3.60 GHz)
8x Crestmont
B-Core 1.80 GHz
4x Kryo 250 Silver
0.70 GHz (2.50 GHz)
2x Crestmont
C-Core --

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
Intel® AI Boost AI hardware Qualcomm AI engine
Intel AI Boost @ 1.4 GHz (OpenVINO, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT) AI specifications Hexagon 546
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

Intel Iris Xe 8 Core Graphics 128 EUs (Meteor Lake) GPU Qualcomm Adreno 506
0.60 GHz GPU frequency 0.60 GHz
2.20 GHz GPU (Turbo) 0.60 GHz
-- GPU Generation 5
5 nm Technology 14 nm
4 Max. displays 0
128 Compute units --
1024 Shader 96
Yes Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
32 GB Max. GPU Memory --
12.2 DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Intel Iris Xe 8 Core Graphics 128 EUs (Meteor Lake) GPU Qualcomm Adreno 506
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VP9 No
Decode Codec VP8 No
Decode / Encode Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to 96 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 supports a maximum of 4 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 7.5 GB/s enabled.

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
LPDDR5X-7500, DDR5-5600 Memory LPDDR3-1866
96 GB Max. Memory 4 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
120.0 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 7.5 GB/s
No ECC No
14.00 MB L2 Cache --
18.00 MB L3 Cache --
5.0 PCIe version --
20 PCIe lanes --
78.8 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H has a TDP of 28 W. The TDP of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
28 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
115 W TDP (PL2) --
65 W TDP up --
20 W TDP down --
110 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H has 32.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 7 nm. The cache of Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 14 nm.

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
7 nm Technology 14 nm
Chiplet Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 ISA extensions --
BGA 2049 Socket --
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 11, Linux Operating systems Android
Q4/2023 Release date Q3/2018
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.5 stars (2 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 1.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (15%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (10%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.60 GHz
1667 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
265 (16%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.20 GHz
10765 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
1127 (10%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.60 GHz
2247 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
286 (13%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.20 GHz
10239 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
1053 (10%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
Intel Iris Xe 8 Core Graphics 128 EUs (Meteor Lake) @ 2.20 GHz
4361 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
Qualcomm Adreno 506 @ 0.60 GHz
115 (3%)

Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)

The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.60 GHz
100 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.60 GHz
847 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.60 GHz
1692 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.20 GHz
14771 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 1.70 GHz
0 (0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
123650 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14C 18T @ 4.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
2007 (100%)

CPU performance per watt (efficiency)

Efficiency of the processor under full load in the Cinebench R23 (multi-core) benchmark. The benchmark result is divided by the average energy required (CPU package power in watts). The higher the value, the more efficient the CPU is under full load.
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
14,771 CB R23 MC @ 66 W
224 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
1.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4GQualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 460Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 630Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 665Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
7. Intel Core Ultra 5 135HAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme Intel Core Ultra 5 135H vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 632Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632


back to index