Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core i7-1280P vs MediaTek MT8389
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Core i7-1280P
100 %
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Alder Lake)
MediaTek MT8389
0 %
PowerVR SGX544
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
213 entries
213 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-1280P | MediaTek MT8389 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core i7 (300) | Mediatek MT-Serie (72) |
| CPU group | Intel Core i 1200P/1200U (21) | MediaTek MT83xx A7 (6) |
| Architecture | Alder Lake U | Cortex-A7 |
| Technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | BGA 1744 | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-1280P | MediaTek MT8389 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | normal |
| Core Cluster 1: | 6x Golden Cove 1.80 - 4.80 GHz |
4x Cortex-A7 1.20 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 8x Gracemont 1.30 - 3.60 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 11.50 MB | 1.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | 24.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-1280P | MediaTek MT8389 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Alder Lake) | PowerVR SGX544 |
| GPU frequency | 0.40 - 1.45 GHz | 0.29 - 0.29 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 96 / 768 | 2 / 4 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 4 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 32 GB | |
| Technology | 10 nm | 45nm |
| Release date | Q1/2022 | Q1/2010 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-1280P | MediaTek MT8389 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-1280P | MediaTek MT8389 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5-5200 (83.2 GB/s) DDR5-4800 (76.8 GB/s) LPDDR4X-4266 (68.2 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) | LPDDR2 |
| Max. Memory | 64 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 0 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 4.0 x 28 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 55.1 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-1280P | MediaTek MT8389 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 28 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | 64 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-1280P | MediaTek MT8389 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Android |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | |
| Release date | Q1/2022 | Q2/2013 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core i7-1280P is 4.2 stars (22 ratings), while MediaTek MT8389 has received 0 stars (0 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Core i7-1280P
14C / 20T · 4.80 GHz
9
MediaTek MT8389
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
