Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core i3-4100M vs AMD FX-7600P
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Core i3-4100M
100 %
2C / 4T · 2.50 GHz
AMD FX-7600P
65 %
4C / 4T · 3.60 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Core i3-4100M
100 %
2C / 4T · 2.50 GHz
AMD FX-7600P
82 %
4C / 4T · 3.60 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Core i3-4100M
52 %
Intel HD Graphics 4600
AMD FX-7600P
100 %
AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Kaveri)
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-4100M | AMD FX-7600P |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core i3 (205) | AMD FX (30) |
| CPU group | Intel Core i 4000M/4000H (38) | AMD FX-7000 (2) |
| Architecture | Haswell H | Kaveri (Steamroller) |
| Technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Desktop |
| Socket | PGA 946 | FM2+ |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-4100M | AMD FX-7600P |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 4x |
| Frequency: | 2.50 GHz | 2.70 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.60 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.60 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 3.00 MB | 4.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-4100M | AMD FX-7600P |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Kaveri) |
| GPU frequency | 0.20 - 1.15 GHz | 0.72 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 20 / 160 | 8 / 512 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 2 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2013 | Q1/2014 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-4100M | AMD FX-7600P |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-4100M | AMD FX-7600P |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) | DDR3-2133 (34.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 32 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | Yes |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-4100M | AMD FX-7600P |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 37 W | 35 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-4100M | AMD FX-7600P |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Unknown |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 |
| Release date | Q4/2013 | Q2/2014 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core i3-4100M is 2.4 stars (5 ratings), while AMD FX-7600P has received 0 stars (0 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Core i3-4100M
2C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
9
AMD FX-7600P
4C / 4T · 3.60 GHz
Popular Comparisons
