Intel Core i3-14100 vs Intel Celeron N5105

The Intel Celeron N5105, based on the Jasper Lake architecture, was manufactured in 10 nm and is aimed at energy-efficient, cost-effective systems for basic tasks.

It features four cores and four threads. The internal graphics unit is the Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Jasper Lake). The processor supports PCIe 3.0 and offers a maximum memory bandwidth of 47 GB/s with 2 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. Its low power consumption often allows for fanless designs. Single-core performance is sufficient for basic tasks, while multi-core performance is designed for simple multitasking scenarios.

The Intel Core i3-14100, built on the Raptor Lake S Refresh architecture, also in 10 nm, is a significantly more powerful option for mainstream desktops.

It features four P-cores and eight threads, enabled by Hyper-Threading. The integrated graphics unit is the Intel UHD Graphics 730. This processor supports the newer PCIe 5.0 standard and achieves a higher maximum memory bandwidth of 77 GB/s. With 5 MB L2 and 12 MB L3 cache, it offers faster data access.

Its single-core performance is substantially higher than that of the Intel Celeron N5105, and its multi-core performance also significantly surpasses it, meaning a performance difference of well over 10 percent in both categories. In a performance comparison, the Intel Core i3-14100 shows significantly better performance in single-core and multi-core applications.

The single-core performance of the Intel Core i3-14100 is many times higher, and its multi-core performance also significantly surpasses that of the Intel Celeron N5105, making it predestined for more demanding software and smooth multitasking. For gaming scenarios, the Intel Core i3-14100 is the significantly better choice.

Its higher clock speed, superior single-core performance, and the more powerful integrated Intel UHD Graphics 730 enable a more playable experience in many titles. Furthermore, PCIe 5.0 support offers a future-proof platform for dedicated high-performance graphics cards. The Intel Celeron N5105, on the other hand, is hardly suitable for gaming; its performance is only sufficient for very undemanding or older games at low settings.

Regarding power consumption and TDP, the Intel Celeron N5105 has very low consumption, which is ideal for energy-efficient systems and often allows for passive cooling. The Intel Core i3-14100 has a higher TDP, which requires stronger cooling but in return delivers significantly higher computing power.

The price-performance ratio of the Intel Celeron N5105 is excellent for its niche of ultra-low-power devices and simple tasks where the acquisition cost should be minimal. The Intel Core i3-14100 offers a strong price-performance ratio for mainstream desktops looking for a good balance of performance and cost.

It provides much higher performance for a moderate price increase, but requires a correspondingly more powerful platform. In summary, the Intel Celeron N5105 offers extreme energy efficiency and is ideal for basic computing requirements such as web browsing, word processing, and media playback in fanless or very compact systems.

The Intel Core i3-14100, on the other hand, is recommended for users who desire a responsive desktop experience, be it for multitasking, office applications, light image editing, or occasional gaming.