Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | Samsung Exynos 2200 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Core 2 Quad Q9650 or Samsung Exynos 2200 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 was released in Q3/2008. The Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 2200 was released in Q1/2022. |
||
Intel Core2 Quad (19) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8000/Q9000 (16) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 2200 (1) |
2 | Generation | 6 |
Yorkfield (Penryn) | Architecture | Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510 |
Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
-- | Predecessor | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
-- | Successor | -- |
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 is 3.00 GHz while the Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is at 2.80 GHz. |
||
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
normal | Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
No | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking ? | No |
3.00 GHz | A-Core | 2.80 GHz 1x Cortex-X2 |
-- | B-Core | 2.52 GHz 3x Cortex-A710 |
-- | C-Core | 1.82 GHz 4x Cortex-A510 |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 or Samsung Exynos 2200 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
no iGPU | GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
GPU frequency | 1.30 GHz | |
-- | GPU (Turbo) | 1.30 GHz |
-- | GPU Generation | 1 |
Technology | 4 nm | |
Max. displays | 0 | |
-- | Compute units | 24 |
-- | Shader | 384 |
No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
No | Frame Generation | No |
-- | Max. GPU Memory | 4 GB |
-- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
no iGPU | GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec VP8 | No |
No | Codec AV1 | Decode |
No | Codec AVC | No |
No | Codec VC-1 | No |
No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 can use up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 17.1 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 2200 supports up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s. |
||
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 | Memory | LPDDR5-6400 |
16 GB | Max. Memory | 12 GB |
2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
17.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
No | ECC | No |
12.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
-- | L3 Cache | -- |
-- | PCIe version | -- |
-- | PCIe lanes | -- |
-- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 is 95 W, while the Samsung Exynos 2200 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
95 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
-- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
-- | TDP up | -- |
-- | TDP down | -- |
-- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 is manufactured in 45 nm and has 12.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 2200 is manufactured in 4 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache. |
||
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
45 nm | Technology | 4 nm |
Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv9-A (64 bit) |
MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1 | ISA extensions | -- |
LGA 775 | Socket | -- |
VT-x, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
No | AES-NI | No |
Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
Q3/2008 | Release date | Q1/2022 |
-- | Release price | -- |
show more data | show more data | |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
4C 4T @ 3.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
4C 4T @ 3.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
4C 4T @ 3.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
4C 4T @ 3.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
4C 4T @ 3.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
4C 4T @ 3.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
@ 0.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 1.30 GHz |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
4C 4T @ 3.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
4C 4T @ 3.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
4C 4T @ 3.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
4C 4T @ 3.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Devices using this processor |
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
Unknown | Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra |