Intel Celeron SU2300 vs AMD A10-6700T
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron SU2300 | AMD A10-6700T | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Celeron SU2300 and the AMD A10-6700T and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Intel Celeron SU2300 2 core processor released in Q3/2009 with the AMD A10-6700T which has 4 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2013. |
||
| Intel Celeron (165) | Family | AMD A (112) |
| Intel Celeron SU2000 (1) | CPU group | AMD A10-6000 (4) |
| 1 | Generation | 3 |
| Montevina (Penryn) | Architecture | Richland (Piledriver) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron SU2300 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.20 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The AMD A10-6700T clocks with 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz), has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. |
||
| Intel Celeron SU2300 | Characteristic | AMD A10-6700T |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.20 GHz | Frequency | 2.50 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.50 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.50 GHz |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | AMD Radeon HD 8650D |
| GPU frequency | 0.72 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | 5 |
| Technology | 32 nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 6 |
| -- | Shader | 384 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11.2 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | AMD Radeon HD 8650D |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 0 memory channels is supported by the Intel Celeron SU2300, while the AMD A10-6700T supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 29.9 GB/s enabled. |
||
| Intel Celeron SU2300 | Characteristic | AMD A10-6700T |
| Memory | DDR3-1866 | |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 0 | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 29.9 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| 1.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 4.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe Intel Celeron SU2300 has a TDP of 10 W. The TDP of the AMD A10-6700T is 45 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| Intel Celeron SU2300 | Characteristic | AMD A10-6700T |
| 10 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 45 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron SU2300 has 1.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 45 nm. The cache of AMD A10-6700T is at 4.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 32 nm. |
||
| Intel Celeron SU2300 | Characteristic | AMD A10-6700T |
| 45 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3,SSSE3 | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 |
| BGA 956 | Socket | FM2 |
| VT-x | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2009 | Release date | Q3/2013 |
| -- | Release price | 125 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
Intel Celeron SU2300
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
AMD A10-6700T
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Celeron SU2300
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A10-6700T
AMD Radeon HD 8650D @ 0.72 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Celeron SU2300
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A10-6700T
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron SU2300
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A10-6700T
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron SU2300 | AMD A10-6700T |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
