Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron N5105 vs MediaTek MT6739
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron N5105
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.90 GHz
MediaTek MT6739
14 %
4C / 4T · 1.50 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron N5105
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.60 GHz
MediaTek MT6739
15 %
4C / 4T · 1.50 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Celeron N5105
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Jasper Lake)
MediaTek MT6739
3 %
PowerVR GE8100
More benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5105 | MediaTek MT6739 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Mediatek MT-Serie (72) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron N4000/N5000 (6) | MediaTek MT67xx (17) |
| Architecture | Jasper Lake | Cortex-A53 |
| Technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | BGA 1338 | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5105 | MediaTek MT6739 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x Tremont | 4x Cortex-A53 |
| Frequency: | 2.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.90 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.60 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 1.50 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5105 | MediaTek MT6739 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Jasper Lake) | PowerVR GE8100 |
| GPU frequency | 0.45 - 0.90 GHz | 0.57 - 0.57 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 24 / 192 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 2 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | |
| Technology | 10 nm | 20 nm |
| Release date | Q1/2021 | Q1/2017 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5105 | MediaTek MT6739 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5105 | MediaTek MT6739 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2933 (46.9 GB/s) | LPDDR3-667 (5.3 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 8 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 7.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5105 | MediaTek MT6739 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | 20 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N5105 | MediaTek MT6739 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Android |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | |
| Release date | Q1/2021 | Q4/2017 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron N5105 is 3.8 stars (87 ratings), while MediaTek MT6739 has received 4.1 stars (7 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
MediaTek MT6739
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Celeron N5105
4C / 4T · 2.90 GHz
Popular Comparisons
