Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Celeron 6305

The Intel Celeron N4020 is based on the Gemini Lake architecture and is manufactured using a 14-nanometer process.

This processor is aimed at budget-conscious beginners for simple office tasks or web browsing. With two cores and two threads, the computing unit is designed for basic applications. In common benchmarks, the Intel Celeron N4020 achieves lower single-core and multi-core performance than the comparison model.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 600 is suitable for video playback but offers hardly any reserves for even simple games. A major advantage is the low thermal design power of only six watts, which often allows for silent cooling. With a memory bandwidth of 38 GB/s and four megabytes of Level 3 cache, it represents a solid, very economical solution for the simplest tasks.

The Intel Celeron 6305 is based on the Tiger Lake U architecture and is manufactured using a more efficient 10-nanometer process.

It is designed for affordable laptops that require a higher response speed in everyday use. The processor also offers two cores and two threads as well as four megabytes of Level 3 cache. In single-core and multi-core performance, the Intel Celeron 6305 significantly outperforms the competing model by more than ten percent.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EUs) enables better graphical representation in simple scenarios. The thermal design power is 15 watts, which usually requires active cooling. Despite a memory bandwidth of 30 GB/s, the more modern architecture ensures a better price-performance ratio. This processor is recommended for users who value smoother working.