Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Celeron 1020M
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Celeron N4020
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel Celeron 1020M
77 %
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Celeron 1020M |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000 (11) | Intel Celeron 1000 (9) |
| Architecture | Gemini Lake | Ivy Bridge U |
| Technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 1090 | PGA 988 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Celeron 1020M |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 2x |
| Frequency: | 1.10 GHz | 2.10 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.80 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.70 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | 2.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Celeron 1020M |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) |
| GPU frequency | 0.20 - 0.65 GHz | 0.65 - 1.00 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 12 / 96 | 6 / 48 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2017 | Q4/2012 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Celeron 1020M |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Celeron 1020M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) | DDR3L-1600 (25.6 GB/s) DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 6 | 2.0 x 16 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 3.0 GB/s | 8.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Celeron 1020M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 6 W | 35 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 4.8 W | |
| T. junction max. | 105 °C | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Celeron 1020M |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q4/2019 | Q1/2013 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron N4020 is 2.1 stars (253 ratings), while Intel Celeron 1020M has received 0 stars (0 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Celeron N4020
2C / 2T · 2.80 GHz
9
Intel Celeron 1020M
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
