Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Atom Z3785
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Celeron N4020
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel Atom Z3785
43 %
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Atom Z3785 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Atom (108) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000 (11) | Intel Atom Z3700 (16) |
| Architecture | Gemini Lake | Bay Trail |
| Technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 1090 | BGA 1380 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Atom Z3785 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 4x |
| Frequency: | 1.10 GHz | 1.49 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.80 GHz | 2.41 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.70 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | 2.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Atom Z3785 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) |
| GPU frequency | 0.20 - 0.65 GHz | 0.31 - 0.83 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 12 / 96 | 4 / 32 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 2 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2017 | Q3/2013 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Atom Z3785 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Atom Z3785 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) | LPDDR3-1333 (21.3 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 6 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 3.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Atom Z3785 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 6 W | 4 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 4.8 W | |
| T. junction max. | 105 °C | 90 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Atom Z3785 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q4/2019 | Q2/2014 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron N4020 is 2.1 stars (246 ratings), while Intel Atom Z3785 has received 0 stars (0 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Intel Celeron N4020
2C / 2T · 2.80 GHz
9
Intel Atom Z3785
4C / 4T · 2.41 GHz
Popular Comparisons
