Intel Celeron N3010 vs Samsung Exynos 9611

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Celeron N3010 CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 9611
Intel Celeron N3010 Samsung Exynos 9611

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Celeron N3010 and the Samsung Exynos 9611 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Intel Celeron N3010 2 core processor released in Q1/2016 with the Samsung Exynos 9611 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q4/2018.
Intel Celeron (165) Family Samsung Exynos (47)
Intel Celeron J3000/N3000 (10) CPU group Samsung Exynos 9600 (3)
8 Generation 3
Braswell Architecture Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Celeron N3010 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.04 GHz (2.24 GHz). The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 9611 clocks with 2.30 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

Intel Celeron N3010 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9611
2 Cores 8
2 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
1.04 GHz (2.24 GHz) A-Core 2.30 GHz
4x Cortex-A73
-- B-Core 1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Intel Celeron N3010 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9611
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

Intel HD Graphics 400 GPU ARM Mali-G72 MP3
0.32 GHz GPU frequency 0.85 GHz
0.60 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
8 GPU Generation Bifrost 2
14 nm Technology 16 nm
3 Max. displays 1
12 Compute units 3
96 Shader 48
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
8 GB Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
12 DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Intel HD Graphics 400 GPU ARM Mali-G72 MP3
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
Decode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to 8 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Celeron N3010, while the Samsung Exynos 9611 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

Intel Celeron N3010 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9611
DDR3L-1600 Memory LPDDR4X-1600
8 GB Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 0
25.6 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
2.00 MB L3 Cache --
2.0 PCIe version --
4 PCIe lanes --
2.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The Intel Celeron N3010 has a TDP of 4 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 9611 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Intel Celeron N3010 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9611
4 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
3 W TDP down --
90 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Celeron N3010 has 2.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 14 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 9611 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 10 nm.

Intel Celeron N3010 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9611
14 nm Technology 10 nm
Monolithic Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2 ISA extensions --
BGA 1170 Socket --
VT-x, VT-x EPT Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q1/2016 Release date Q4/2018
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Celeron N3010 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 9611 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.4 stars (7 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Intel Celeron N3010 (57%)
Samsung Exynos 9611 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Intel Celeron N3010 (29%)
Samsung Exynos 9611 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron N3010 Intel Celeron N3010
2C 2T @ 2.24 GHz
226 (65%)
Samsung Exynos 9611 Samsung Exynos 9611
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
347 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron N3010 Intel Celeron N3010
2C 2T @ 2.24 GHz
427 (33%)
Samsung Exynos 9611 Samsung Exynos 9611
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1277 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Intel Celeron N3010 Intel Celeron N3010
2C 2T @ 2.24 GHz
178 (49%)
Samsung Exynos 9611 Samsung Exynos 9611
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
367 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Intel Celeron N3010 Intel Celeron N3010
2C 2T @ 2.24 GHz
320 (28%)
Samsung Exynos 9611 Samsung Exynos 9611
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1126 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Celeron N3010 Intel Celeron N3010
Intel HD Graphics 400 @ 0.60 GHz
126 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9611 Samsung Exynos 9611
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz
94 (75%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Celeron N3010 Intel Celeron N3010
2C 2T @ 2.24 GHz
623 (26%)
Samsung Exynos 9611 Samsung Exynos 9611
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
2401 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Intel Celeron N3010 Intel Celeron N3010
2C 2T @ 1.04 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 9611 Samsung Exynos 9611
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
179265 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron N3010 Intel Celeron N3010
2C 2T @ 2.24 GHz
38 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9611 Samsung Exynos 9611
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron N3010 Intel Celeron N3010
2C 2T @ 2.24 GHz
69 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9611 Samsung Exynos 9611
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Celeron N3010 Samsung Exynos 9611
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Samsung Exynos 9611Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
2. Samsung Exynos 9611Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GSamsung Exynos 9611 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Samsung Exynos 9611
4. Samsung Exynos 9611Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
5. Samsung Exynos 9611Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
6. Samsung Exynos 9611Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
7. Samsung Exynos 9611Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
8. Apple A12 BionicSamsung Exynos 9611 Apple A12 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9611
9. Samsung Exynos 9611Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
10. Samsung Exynos 9611Samsung Exynos 1330 Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Samsung Exynos 1330


back to index