Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron N2815 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2815 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | AMD Ryzen Threadripper (16) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 (17) | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9000 (3) |
| Architecture | Bay Trail | Shimada Peak (Zen 5) |
| Technology | 22 nm | 4 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Desktop |
| Socket | BGA 1170 | TRX50 |
| Predecessor | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7980X | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2815 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 64 / 128 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 64x Zen 5 |
| Frequency: | 1.86 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.13 GHz | 5.40 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.13 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 64.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 1.00 MB | 256.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✓ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2815 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.31 - 0.76 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 32 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | |
| Technology | 22 nm | |
| Release date | Q3/2013 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2815 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2815 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) | DDR5-6400 (190.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | 1024 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| ECC | No | Yes |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 4 | 5.0 x 88 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 2.0 GB/s | 346.5 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2815 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7.5 W | 350 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 4.5 W | |
| T. junction max. | 105 °C | 95 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2815 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4A, SSE4.2, SSSE3, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3 |
| Release date | Q4/2013 | Q3/2025 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron N2815 is 3.7 stars (3 ratings), while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X has received 1.7 stars (28 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Celeron N2815
2C / 2T · 2.13 GHz
9
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
64C / 128T · 5.40 GHz
Popular Comparisons
