Intel Celeron N2810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron N2810 | HiSilicon Kirin 970 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Celeron N2810 or HiSilicon Kirin 970 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Celeron N2810 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. Up to 8 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron N2810 was released in Q4/2013. The HiSilicon Kirin 970 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz. The CPU supports up to 8 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 970 was released in Q3/2017. |
||
| Intel Celeron (165) | Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 (17) | CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1) |
| 6 | Generation | 6 |
| Bay Trail | Architecture | Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron N2810 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz. The HiSilicon Kirin 970 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.40 GHz. |
||
| Intel Celeron N2810 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 970 |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.00 GHz | A-Core | 2.40 GHz 4x Cortex-A73 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.84 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | GPU | ARM Mali-G72 MP12 |
| 0.31 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.75 GHz |
| 0.76 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 7 | GPU Generation | Bifrost 2 |
| 22 nm | Technology | 16 nm |
| 2 | Max. displays | 1 |
| 4 | Compute units | 12 |
| 32 | Shader | 192 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 2 GB | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| 11.2 | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | GPU | ARM Mali-G72 MP12 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Celeron N2810 supports a maximum of 8 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 970 can connect up to 8 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Celeron N2810 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 970 |
| DDR3-1066 | Memory | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| 8 GB | Max. Memory | 8 GB |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| 17.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 1.00 MB | L3 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| 2.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 4 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 2.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Celeron N2810 has a TDP of 7.5 W, that of the HiSilicon Kirin 970 is 9 W. |
||
| Intel Celeron N2810 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 970 |
| 7.5 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 9 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| 4.5 W | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron N2810 has a 1.00 MB cache, while the HiSilicon Kirin 970 cache has a total of 2.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Celeron N2810 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 970 |
| 22 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | ISA extensions | -- |
| BGA 1170 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q4/2013 | Release date | Q3/2017 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Celeron N2810
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron N2810
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Celeron N2810
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.76 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 970
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 @ 0.75 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Celeron N2810
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Celeron N2810
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron N2810
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron N2810 | HiSilicon Kirin 970 |
| Unknown | Huawei Honor 10 Huawei Note 10 Huawei Play Huawei Honor View 10 Huawei Mate 10 Pro Huawei P20 Huawei Nova 3 Huawei Nova 4 |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
