Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron N2808 vs AMD E-300
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron N2808
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.25 GHz
AMD E-300
48 %
2C / 2T · 1.30 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron N2808
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.25 GHz
AMD E-300
46 %
2C / 2T · 1.30 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Celeron N2808
64 %
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
AMD E-300
100 %
AMD Radeon HD 6310
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2808 | AMD E-300 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | AMD E (23) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 (17) | AMD E/E1/E2-1000 (5) |
| Architecture | Bay Trail | Zacate (Bobcat) |
| Technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 1170 | BGA 413 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2808 | AMD E-300 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 2x |
| Frequency: | 1.58 GHz | 1.30 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.25 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.25 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 1.00 MB | 1.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2808 | AMD E-300 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | AMD Radeon HD 6310 |
| GPU frequency | 0.31 - 0.79 GHz | 0.49 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 32 | 1 / 80 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 2 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Release date | Q3/2013 | Q4/2010 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2808 | AMD E-300 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2808 | AMD E-300 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1333 (10.7 GB/s) | DDR3-1066 (8.5 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 4 GB | |
| Memory channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 4 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 2.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2808 | AMD E-300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 4.5 W | 18 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 3 W | |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2808 | AMD E-300 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Unknown |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX |
| Release date | Q2/2014 | Q3/2011 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron N2808 is 3.6 stars (5 ratings), while AMD E-300 has received 2.7 stars (10 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Intel Celeron N2808
2C / 2T · 2.25 GHz
9
AMD E-300
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
