Intel Celeron J3355 vs Intel Celeron J4025

Introduction: The Intel Celeron J3355 (Apollo Lake) is an energy-efficient processor for entry-level desktops.

Its successor, the Intel Celeron J4025 (Gemini Lake), targets the same market and offers improved overall performance.

Manufacturing, Cores, and Cache: Both 14 nm CPUs feature 2 cores and 2 threads. The Intel Celeron J3355 has 2 MB L3 cache and 30 GB/s memory bandwidth. The Intel Celeron J4025 offers 4 MB L3 cache and 38 GB/s memory bandwidth. Both support PCIe 2.0. Performance and Gaming: The Intel Celeron J4025 significantly outperforms the J3355 in single- and multi-core performance, thanks to architectural improvements and a larger L3 cache.

This ensures more responsive applications. Both Celeron processors are unsuitable for gaming; the J4025, with Intel UHD Graphics 600, offers a minimal advantage over Intel HD Graphics 500 in very simple titles. Energy Efficiency and Price-Performance Ratio: Both processors are known for high energy efficiency and low power dissipation, ideal for fanless systems.

Celeron processors are budget-friendly. Despite a slightly higher price, the J4025 offers significantly improved performance, making it the more economical choice for most users. Summary and Recommendation: The Intel Celeron J3355 is a cost-effective option for minimal requirements.

The Intel Celeron J4025 offers improved performance and graphics unit for a small additional price. It is the more recommendable choice for most basic applications like office work and media consumption for a more balanced user experience.