Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron J3160 vs Intel Celeron J4105
Last updated:
Summary
The Intel Celeron J3160 (Braswell architecture) is an energy-efficient quad-core processor with four threads, manufactured using the 14 nm process.
It features 2 MB of Level 3 Cache and an Intel HD Graphics 400 with 26 GB/s memory bandwidth. Designed for cost-effective and basic desktop applications. The Intel Celeron J4105 (Gemini Lake architecture) is also an energy-efficient quad-core processor (14 nm) with four threads.
It offers 4 MB of Level 3 Cache and a more powerful Intel UHD Graphics 600 with 38 GB/s memory bandwidth. It targets a similar segment but offers a more modern foundation. In a performance comparison, the Intel Celeron J4105 shows significantly superior single-core and multi-core performance, making it more responsive for everyday tasks.
Neither is suitable for demanding gaming, but the newer graphics unit of the Intel Celeron J4105 offers slightly improved rendering for simple games and 4K media. Both processors are characterized by low power consumption and low Thermal Design Power (TDP), ideal for fanless systems.
The Intel Celeron J4105 offers superior value for money due to its performance. It is recommended for smoother everyday use, while the Intel Celeron J3160 suffices for extremely budget-conscious systems or very basic tasks.
It features 2 MB of Level 3 Cache and an Intel HD Graphics 400 with 26 GB/s memory bandwidth. Designed for cost-effective and basic desktop applications. The Intel Celeron J4105 (Gemini Lake architecture) is also an energy-efficient quad-core processor (14 nm) with four threads.
It offers 4 MB of Level 3 Cache and a more powerful Intel UHD Graphics 600 with 38 GB/s memory bandwidth. It targets a similar segment but offers a more modern foundation. In a performance comparison, the Intel Celeron J4105 shows significantly superior single-core and multi-core performance, making it more responsive for everyday tasks.
Neither is suitable for demanding gaming, but the newer graphics unit of the Intel Celeron J4105 offers slightly improved rendering for simple games and 4K media. Both processors are characterized by low power consumption and low Thermal Design Power (TDP), ideal for fanless systems.
The Intel Celeron J4105 offers superior value for money due to its performance. It is recommended for smoother everyday use, while the Intel Celeron J3160 suffices for extremely budget-conscious systems or very basic tasks.
Intel Celeron J3160
- Braswell architecture
- Four cores, four threads
- Intel HD Graphics 400
- Low power consumption
Intel Celeron J4105
- Gemini Lake architecture
- Significantly higher CPU performance
- Intel UHD Graphics 600
- Better 4K media playback
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron J3160
52 %
4C / 4T · 2.24 GHz
Intel Celeron J4105
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.50 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron J3160
51 %
4C / 4T · 2.24 GHz
Intel Celeron J4105
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.40 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron J3160
49 %
4C / 4T · 2.24 GHz
Intel Celeron J4105
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.50 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron J3160
50 %
4C / 4T · 2.24 GHz
Intel Celeron J4105
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.40 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Celeron J3160
100 %
Intel HD Graphics 400
Intel Celeron J4105
98 %
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron J3160
52 %
4C / 4T · 2.24 GHz
Intel Celeron J4105
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.50 GHz
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron J3160
52 %
4C / 4T · 2.24 GHz
Intel Celeron J4105
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.40 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J3160 | Intel Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron J3000/N3000 (10) | Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000 (11) |
| Architecture | Braswell | Gemini Lake |
| Technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 1170 | BGA 1090 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J3160 | Intel Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 4x |
| Frequency: | 1.60 GHz | 1.50 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.24 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.24 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | 4.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J3160 | Intel Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics 400 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| GPU frequency | 0.32 - 0.70 GHz | 0.25 - 0.75 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 12 / 96 | 12 / 96 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Release date | Q1/2015 | Q4/2017 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J3160 | Intel Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J3160 | Intel Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3L-1600 (25.6 GB/s) | DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 4 | 2.0 x 6 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 2.0 GB/s | 3.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J3160 | Intel Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 6 W | 10 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 90 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J3160 | Intel Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q1/2016 | Q4/2017 |
| Release price | 107 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron J3160 is 3.4 stars (7 ratings), while Intel Celeron J4105 has received 3.8 stars (31 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Celeron J4105
4C / 4T · 2.50 GHz
9
Intel Celeron J3160
4C / 4T · 2.24 GHz
Popular Comparisons
