Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Xeon W-3365
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Xeon W (97) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 (17) | Intel Xeon W-3300 (5) |
| Architecture | Bay Trail | Ice Lake W |
| Technology | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Enterprise / Embedded |
| Socket | BGA 1170 | LGA 4189 |
| Predecessor | Intel Xeon W-3265 | |
| Successor | Intel Xeon w7-3465X |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 32 / 64 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 32x |
| Frequency: | 2.00 GHz | 2.70 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.42 GHz | 4.00 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.42 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| L2-Cache | 40.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | 48.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.69 - 0.85 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 32 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | |
| Technology | 22 nm | |
| Release date | Q3/2013 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1333 (21.3 GB/s) | DDR4-3200 (204.8 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | 4096 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 8 |
| ECC | No | Yes |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 4 | 4.0 x 64 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 2.0 GB/s | 126.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | 270 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 |
| Release date | Q4/2013 | Q3/2021 |
| Release price | 35 $ | 3499 $ |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron J1900 is 4.0 stars (40 ratings), while Intel Xeon W-3365 has received 2.0 stars (1 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Celeron J1900
4C / 4T · 2.42 GHz
9
Intel Xeon W-3365
32C / 64T · 4.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
