Intel Celeron G1610T vs AMD EPYC 7F52

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Celeron G1610T CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD EPYC 7F52
Intel Celeron G1610T AMD EPYC 7F52

CPU comparison

Intel Celeron G1610T or AMD EPYC 7F52 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Intel Celeron G1610T has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. Up to 32 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron G1610T was released in Q1/2013.

The AMD EPYC 7F52 has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7F52 was released in Q2/2020.
Intel Celeron (165) Family AMD EPYC (129)
Intel Celeron G1000 (12) CPU group AMD EPYC 7002 (24)
3 Generation 2
Ivy Bridge S Architecture Rome (Zen 2)
Desktop / Server Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Celeron G1610T has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron G1610T is 2.30 GHz while the AMD EPYC 7F52 has 16 CPU cores and 32 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7F52 is at 3.50 GHz (3.90 GHz).

Intel Celeron G1610T Characteristic AMD EPYC 7F52
2 Cores 16
2 Threads 32
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
2.30 GHz Frequency 3.50 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) 3.90 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) 3.70 GHz

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Intel Celeron G1610T Characteristic AMD EPYC 7F52
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The Intel Celeron G1610T or AMD EPYC 7F52 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) GPU no iGPU
0.65 GHz GPU frequency --
1.05 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
7 GPU Generation --
22 nm Technology
3 Max. displays
6 Compute units --
48 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
2 GB Max. GPU Memory --
11.0 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) GPU no iGPU
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode Codec VC-1 No
Decode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The Intel Celeron G1610T can use up to 32 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 21.3 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 7F52 supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s.

Intel Celeron G1610T Characteristic AMD EPYC 7F52
DDR3-1333 Memory DDR4-3200
32 GB Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 8 (Octa Channel)
21.3 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
Yes ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache --
2.00 MB L3 Cache 256.00 MB
2.0 PCIe version 4.0
16 PCIe lanes 128
8.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth 252.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Celeron G1610T is 35 W, while the AMD EPYC 7F52 has a TDP of 240 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

Intel Celeron G1610T Characteristic AMD EPYC 7F52
35 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 240 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Celeron G1610T is manufactured in 22 nm and has 2.00 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7F52 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 256.00 MB cache.

Intel Celeron G1610T Characteristic AMD EPYC 7F52
22 nm Technology 7 nm
Monolithic Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2 ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
LGA 1155 Socket SP3
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
Yes AES-NI Yes
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q1/2013 Release date Q2/2020
42 $ Release price 3100 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Celeron G1610T to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 7F52 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T (41%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T (5%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
2C 2T @ 2.30 GHz
476 (41%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.90 GHz
1166 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
2C 2T @ 2.30 GHz
854 (6%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz
14477 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
2C 2T @ 2.30 GHz
1370 (3%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz
41028 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
2C 2T @ 2.30 GHz
412 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.90 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
2C 2T @ 2.30 GHz
712 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
2C 2T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.90 GHz
446 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) @ 1.05 GHz
101 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
2C 2T @ 2.30 GHz
81 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.90 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
2C 2T @ 2.30 GHz
154 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Celeron G1610T AMD EPYC 7F52
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Celeron G1610TIntel Pentium N3700 Intel Celeron G1610T vs Intel Pentium N3700
2. Intel Core i5-4300UIntel Celeron G1610T Intel Core i5-4300U vs Intel Celeron G1610T
3. Intel Celeron G1830Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1830 vs Intel Celeron G1610T
4. AMD EPYC 7F52AMD EPYC 7F72 AMD EPYC 7F52 vs AMD EPYC 7F72
5. Intel Celeron 3205UIntel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron 3205U vs Intel Celeron G1610T
6. Intel Celeron G1610TIntel Core i3-4330T Intel Celeron G1610T vs Intel Core i3-4330T
7. Intel Celeron G1610TAMD A8-3520M Intel Celeron G1610T vs AMD A8-3520M
8. Intel Celeron G1610TAMD Phenom II X2 550 Intel Celeron G1610T vs AMD Phenom II X2 550
9. AMD EPYC 7F52AMD EPYC 7302 AMD EPYC 7F52 vs AMD EPYC 7302
10. Intel Celeron G1610TAMD Phenom II X4 910e Intel Celeron G1610T vs AMD Phenom II X4 910e


back to index