Intel Celeron E3400 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Celeron E3400 CPU1 vs CPU2 HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
Intel Celeron E3400 HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G

CPU comparison

Intel Celeron E3400 or HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Intel Celeron E3400 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron E3400 was released in Q1/2010.

The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.36 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G was released in Q2/2019.
Intel Celeron (165) Family HiSilicon Kirin (29)
Intel Celeron E3000 (3) CPU group HiSilicon Kirin 810/820 (3)
1 Generation 6
Wolfdale (Penryn) Architecture Cortex-A76 / Cortex-A55
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Celeron E3400 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.60 GHz. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.36 GHz.

Intel Celeron E3400 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
2 Cores 8
2 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
Yes Overclocking ? No
2.60 GHz
2x Core
A-Core 2.36 GHz
4x Cortex-A76
-- B-Core 1.84 GHz
4x Cortex-A55

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Intel Celeron E3400 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
-- AI hardware HUAWEI HiAI 2.0
-- AI specifications Da Vinci Architecture. Ascend D110 Lite
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G57 MP6
GPU frequency 0.85 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation Vallhall 1
Technology 7 nm
Max. displays 2
-- Compute units 6
-- Shader 96
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 4 GB
-- DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G57 MP6
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 Decode
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The Intel Celeron E3400 supports a maximum of 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G can connect up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels.

Intel Celeron E3400 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 Memory LPDDR4X-2133
16 GB Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
17.1 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
1.00 MB L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 2.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Celeron E3400 has a TDP of 65 W, that of the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G is 6 W.

Intel Celeron E3400 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
65 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 6 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Celeron E3400 has a 1.00 MB cache, while the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G cache has a total of 2.00 MB.

Intel Celeron E3400 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
45 nm Technology 7 nm
Monolithic Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 ISA extensions --
LGA 775 Socket --
VT-x Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q1/2010 Release date Q2/2019
42 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Celeron E3400 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 2.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Celeron E3400 (55%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Celeron E3400 (26%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron E3400 Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz
355 (55%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz
641 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron E3400 Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz
624 (26%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz
2429 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Celeron E3400 Intel Celeron E3400
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
ARM Mali-G57 MP6 @ 0.85 GHz
653 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Intel Celeron E3400 Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz
384634 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Celeron E3400 Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz
846 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
Intel Celeron E3400 Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz
412 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Celeron E3400 HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
Unknown Huawei Honor 30S
Huawei P40 Lite 5G

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. HiSilicon Kirin 820 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 865 HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
2. HiSilicon Kirin 810HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4GHiSilicon Kirin 820 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
4. HiSilicon Kirin 710HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
5. HiSilicon Kirin 980HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
6. HiSilicon Kirin 820 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 662 HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
7. HiSilicon Kirin 820 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 855 HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
8. HiSilicon Kirin 820 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 750G HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
9. HiSilicon Kirin 820 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 870 HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
10. HiSilicon Kirin 820 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G


back to index